Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Executive Stock Options

    Executive compensation packages are typically made up of a mixture of components that include a base salary, benefits, long-term compensationannual bonuses, retirement contributions, stock, and call options on the company's stock. Stock options can, and often do, make up the largest portion of an executive compensation package. Since the 1980s, executive compensation has risen dramatically when compared to the rise in average wages, an increase that has followed the increase in popularity of options trading and executive stock options.

    The popularity of issuing executive stock options has grown for several reasons:

    1. By tying rewards to the performance of the company's stock, stock options help make the executive's interests the same as the shareholders' interests. This helps a company overcome the agency problem.
    2. Stock options make an executive's lower base salary look more inline with average salaries in a company. This just looks good, especially if overall compensation is going up.
    3. If the firm isn't performing well, it doesn't have to pay out large amounts of fixed compensation to its executives.
    4. Most importantly, the popularity of stock options as a part of an executive compensation packages has come from the fact that, in the past, stock options did not have to be expensed against a company's earnings.
    5. Similarly, executives who receive options may not have to count them as income until the options are exercised. This makes writing call options a tax-prefered compensation strategy from the executives' perspective.

    For executive stock options, the exercise price is normally set equal to the market price of the underlying stock for the date that the option is written. That is, we assume that all stock options are "at-the-money" when they are issued. When they are originally granted to an executive, they typically cannot be immediately exercised. A typical "vesting-period" lasts for one to five years. Some options have reloading options, which grant new options to executives when old options are exercised. Similarly, if the price of the company's stock falls, many options will be re-written with a new strike price and longer maturity to continue to provide incentives. These types of special issues make valuing executive stock options more difficult.

    These special issues aside, we can use the Black-Scholes model to reasonably value an executive stock option. In some cases, if the number of shares that executive stock options will grant is high relative to the number of outstanding options, we would need to incorporate the diluting effect of the options by valuing them as warrants (see Warrant Pricing).

    Photo by RKTKN on Unsplash

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com May 23, 2024, 7:04 pm ad1c9bdddf

    BrainMass Solutions Available for Instant Download

    Replication and Risk-Neutral Method: Value of a Call Option

    Burgundy Corporations stock price is currently $100. At the end of 3 months it will be either $110 or $90.91. The risk-free interest rate is 2% per annum. What is the value of a 3-month European call option with a strike price of $100? Calculate your answer to this problem using (a) replication. (b) the risk-neutral method

    Stocks versus stock options

    Your client is a private investor, making his own stock selections. A friend of his told him about the investment opportunity of stock options. He wants to pursue that kind of opportunity but knows little about them. He is visiting tomorrow and asked you to discuss the following with him: a) In layman's terms, explain the big

    Stock Compensation Plans

    (Stock Compensation Plans) The following two items appeared on the Internet concerning the GAAP requirement to expense stock options. -WASHINGTON, D.C February 17, 2005 Congressman David Dreier (R-CA), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D-CA) reintroduced legislation today that will preserve

    Enterprise Managements

    Relative to the Agency Problem, how do compensation and bonus policies impact risk management? Given the recent controversies regarding executive compensation, should stock options and bonuses be eliminated?

    Executive Compensation and Agency Risk

    Relative to the agency problem, how do compensation and bonus policies impact risk management? Given the recent controversies regarding executive compensation, should stock options and bonuses be eliminated?

    expensing for stock options

    How do the provisions of GAAP in this area differ from the bill introduced by members of Congress (Dreier and Eshoo), which would require expensing for options issued to only the top five officers in a company? Which approach do you think would result in more useful information? (Focus on comparability.) The following two ite

    Financial options, stock value, binomial model, Black Scholes model

    See attachment for five questions: 1. Which of the following statements is CORRECT? a. Put options give investors the right to buy a stock at a certain strike price before a specified date. b. Call options give investors the right to sell a stock at a certain strike price before a specified d

    Executive Pay and Benefits, Stock Options Use and Google

    Case 1 (Questions 1-3) No topic inflames the passions of business leaders and shareholders like executive pay. Companies and compensation consultants argue that, in a free market, they'd be foolish not to pay the going rate for top talent. Investors demand that compensation be tied to performance and complain loudly when pay

    Debate the Theories of Accounting for Stock Options

    The purpose of the paper is to describe an understanding and application of knowledge in ONE of the following fields. Focus: Debate the Theories of Accounting for Stock Options Must be able to identify the main issues in the chosen area. Must be enough content for graduate level finance, and must be in the 3rd

    After Enron, WorldCom and other and other major corporate scandals that rocked America in the recent past, it seemed that nothing would surprise investors or regulators. However, almost everyone seems to be shocked by recent revelations that as many as 20% of all public corporations may have allowed their officers and directors to illegally "backdate" their stock option awards. Hardly a day goes by without another public company's fraudulent stock option practices being revealed. A stock option is an award granted under which key employees and directors may buy shares of the Company's stock at the market prices of the stock at the date of the award, As an example assume that Company A's stock price is $15 per share on January 1, 2007. Further assume that the company's CEO is awarded 200,000 shares of the company stock options on that date. This means that after a certain holding (vesting) period, the CEO can buy 200,000 shares of the company's stock at $15 per share, regardless of what the stock price is on the day he or she buys the stock. If the stock price has risen to, say $35 per share, then the CEO can simultaneously buy the 200,000 shares at a total price of $3 million (200,000 times $15 per share) and sell them for $7 million ($35 per share times 200,000 shares), pocketing $4 million. Stock options are a way to provide incentives to executives to work as hard as they can to make their companies profitable and, therefore, have their stock price increase. Until 2006, if the options price ($15 in this case) were the same as the market price on the date the option was granted, the company reported no compensation expense on its income statement. (Under new accounting rule FAS 123R, effective in 2006, the required accounting changed. ) However, if the options were granted at a price lower than the market share price (referred to as "in-the-money" options) on the day the options were granted, say $10 in this example, then the $5 difference between the option granting price and the market price had to be reported as compensation expense by the company and represented taxable income to the recipient. The fraudulent stock option backdating practices involved corporations, by authority of their executives and/or boards of directors, awarding stock options to their officers and directors and dating those options as of a past date on which the share price of the company's stock was unusually low. Dating the options in this post hoc manner ensures that the exercise price will be set well below market, thereby nearly guaranteeing that these options will be "in the money" when they vest and thus will provide the recipients with windfall profits. Backdating stock options violates accounting rules, tax laws, and SEC disclosure rules. Almost all companies being investigated "backdated" their options so they would appear to have been awarded on the low price date despite having actually been authorized months later. 1. Would a good system of internal controls have prevented these fraudulent backdating practices? 2. Why would executives and directors of so many companies have allowed this dishonest practice in their companies? 3. Would a whistle-blower system have helped to prevent or reveal these dishonest practices?

    After Enron, WorldCom and other and other major corporate scandals that rocked America in the recent past, it seemed that nothing would surprise investors or regulators. However, almost everyone seems to be shocked by recent revelations that as many as 20% of all public corporations may have allowed their officers and directors

    This posting addresses stock options as compensation.

    Are stock options the best form of compensation for corporate executives? Would stock options tie the executives pay to the performance of the company? Are stock options more fair that than multi-million dollar salaries or huge bonuses that aren't fixed to the success of the company?

    EPS and Common Stock Accounting

    Please see attachment and work in Excel, easier to understand the concept. Problem 1 On October 15, 2008, the board of directors of Alkaline Chemicals approved a stock option plan for key executives. On January 1, 2009, 36.8 million stock options were granted, exercisable for 36.8 million shares of Alkaline's $1

    Executive Stock Options: Value of At-The-Money Options for ARB

    Executive stock options. It is March 1, 2004 and you have received a job offer from a publicly traded fund manager (stock symbol: ARB) to start in six months. The company needs good people, so they are willing to leave the offer open until then. The compensation package includes 1,000 call options on ARB whose features are discu

    Options Backdating: List several appropriate uses of stock options.

    Options Backdating Granting stock options to key employees was a popular practice in the dot.com days. Start-up companies could offer stock options to employees in the expectations that the options would be worth a great deal if the company took off. Indeed that proved true to many people in high-text fields. However, the

    Case study

    DQ 1 discusses Erik Lie Uncovered. DQ2 discusses Google.

    Company Executive Compensation: Stock Options

    In recent months there have been many news stories in the press about executive compensation with stock options. This type of compensation occurs when an executive is granted the "option" to purchase the company's stock at a certain price sometime in the future. The theory is if the executive is effective his management skills

    What is the lower bound for the price of a six-month European put option? What is the price of a one year European put option? What is expected price of the put at 10:01 am? What is the risk-neutral probability of the stock rising to $34? What is the value of the put?

    Question 4: What is the lower bound for the price of a six-month European put option on a stock when the stock price is $50, the strike price is $55, the risk-free rate is 4% and there are no dividends? Question 5: The price of a European call option on a non-dividend paying stock with a strike price of $60 is $8. The stock

    Investing in options vs investing in stock.

    You strongly believe that the price of Breener Inc. Stock will rise substantially from its current level of $137, and you are considering buying shares on the company. You currently have $13,700 to invest. As alternaltive to purchasing the stock itself, you are also considering buying call options on Breener stock that expire in

    Entries for Various Dilutive Securities

    The stockholders' equity section of McLean Inc. at the beginning of the current year appears below. Common stock, $10 par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares, 300,000 shares issued and outstanding $3,000,000 Paid-in capital in excess of par 600,000 Retained earnings

    Interest Rates, YTM, Options, Stocks, Bonds

    1) "The values of outstanding bonds change whenever the going rate of interest changes. In general, short-term interest rates are more volatile than long-term interest rates. Therefore, short-term bond prices are more sensitive to interest rate changes than are long-term bond prices." Is this statement true or false? Explain

    Law and ethics in stock options

    Your answers should be concise and should demonstrate your ability to analyze facts, integrate relevant legal and ethical principles and provide an analytical approach to the presented problem. (The bottom line is, support any position that you take in your response.) Plato believed that the rulers of the ideal society should

    Description of Stock Options

    Prepare the necessary entries from 1/1/07-2/1/09 for the following events using the fair value method. If no entry is needed, write "No Entry Necessary." 1) On 1/1/07, the stockholders adopted a stock option plan for top executives whereby each might receive rights to purchase up to 12,000 shares of common stock at $40 pe

    Options for Executives

    Why do companies issue options to executives if they cost the company more than they are worth to the executive? Examples please.