Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Strict Liability

    Strict liability exists in both tort and criminal law. It refers to when a defendant is in legal jeopardy by virtue of a wrongful act, without any accompanying intent or mental state.¹ Possession crimes and statutory rape are both examples of strict liability offences in criminal law.¹ There are two broader categories of activities in tort law for which a plaintif may be held stricly liable. These include the possession of certain animals and abnormally dangerous activities.¹ There is also an area in torts known as products liability. The sub-category to this, known as strict products liability, applies w hen a defective product causes injury to a plaintiff.

    In regard to strict liability, there are two different types of intent¹:

    1. General intent: this refers to the actual intent to perform some act, but without a wish for the consequences that result. Depending on the offense, both tort plaintiffs and criminal prosecutors may need to prove that the defendant acted with general intent.
    2. Specific intent: this refers to the actual intent to perform some act, along with a wish for the consequences that result from that act.



    Image source:

    1. Wikimedia


    1. Cornell University Law School. Strict Liability. Retrieved May 13, 2014, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/strict_liability

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com May 24, 2024, 12:45 pm ad1c9bdddf

    BrainMass Solutions Available for Instant Download

    U.S. Law Enforcement: Shifting Priorities and Focus Post-9/11

    I need help with a list of the relative merits and disadvantages of law enforcement's shifting priorities and focus after the 9/11 attacks. I have to do a 5 page research paper and I am not understanding exactly what it is I am suppose to be discussing. Would someone please help guide me in the right direction.