Purchase Solution

Science journalism: Peer Review and Credibility

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

In this discussion, we look at how science journalism - and even journalism relating to other technical or specialised fields - requires a higher level of research rigour in order to maintain a certain quality and standard of content for readers. This is where peer review content is not only essential, but also requires its own vetting process when it comes to the journals being referenced. Furthermore, in addition to using peer review content and having a variety of references from journals with good academic standing, it's also important to cross-reference material across a range of sources.

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

A brief discussion regarding science journalism and the importance of not just referencing appropriate peer review content from journals, but scouting out the standing and impact credibility of journals. These can be important in vetting and cross-referencing certain studies and findings in terms of determining if they are genuinely breakthrough or compounded by design flaws.

Solution Preview

In the field of writing, editing and especially science journalism - as always - quality and accuracy of evidence go a long way in presenting a solid argument while also maintaining readership confidence. When it comes to the research content and data, many journals now exist with a lot of subjects being covered, some even potentially contentious with entries and studies that could be considered contrarian or suspect.

With scientific advancement, there will always be paradigm challenging moments, so a radical sounding claim or hypothesis presented through scientific analysis isn't necessary there to be dismissed. As a matter of fact, one of the perks and appeals of doing science journalism and cultivating an audience and worthwhile reputation sits in the idea of covering groundbreaking developments. However, one needs to be very cautious so as to not fall for questionable entries or contentious write-ups/studies that might be contrary for their own sake, but lack in actual scientific rigour. A thesis or study simply being ...

Solution provided by:
Education
  • MA, London Metropolitian University
  • BSc, London Metropolitan University & University of Derby
Recent Feedback
  • "Hi Leela, I open the file you send to me, some of the arrows do not even connect where it is suppose to be. Yes on the decision is not aligned. If I delete the Yes, it delete every thing on right side. Some of the content in boxes cannot see letters."
  • "Thanks a lot!"
  • "Thnk you so much"
  • "Thank you for your explanation. I'm a little lost with how to format my essay. I'm not sure what should be in a comparative essay's paragraph or the order of the paragraph. I am required to use quotes in my essay and I don't know which ones fit really well with my topic. The translation helps me understand but I'm having trouble identfying important quotes that fit. Also, my instructor just advised that we are required to asses a secondary source about my topic and agree or disagree with it and use it to show understanding of the argument. Can you recommed any sources that would fit well with my topic please? Thank you so much for your help!"
  • "WOW Thank yoi!"
Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Which play is it?

This quiz will give you one of the main ideas of a play. You have to guess which play is being talked about.

Public Speaking Quiz

Quiz your understanding of public speaking. Learn about the elements of a solid speech.

Introduction to Theatre

This quiz will examine the basic knowledge students have of theatre, including terms, history, and purpose.