Compare and contrast the structured interview, situational interview, and behavioral interview. Determine which type of interview would be more beneficial when interviewing applicants. Support your selection.
In the selection of the candidate, determine if the manager should make the final choice or if others should be included in the final decision. Support your position.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 11:25 am ad1c9bdddf
I. Define structured interview, situational interview, and behavioral interview.
II. Compare and contrast the three interview types.
III. Discuss which one is beneficial.
IV. Who should make the hiring decision�"the manager or other person?
The suggested contents of your write-up:
In your definition, you can say that:
Structured interview is a "fixed format interview in which all questions are prepared beforehand and are put in the same order to each interviewee" (WebFinance, 2013).
This type of interview "provides the precision and reliability required in certain situations".
This type of interview required "the interviewer to follow a specific list of pre-determined questions, the focus of the interview will be on what is required for the position" (Doyle, 2013).
Situational interview is a "technique that places an applicant ...
The solution discusses the three interview types such as structured, situational and behavioral. It found out that a combination of situation and behavioral interview is the best. It suggested that the manager should ultimately make the decision on hiring.
Which type of heuristic is present in interview decision. Your goal is to 'persuade'.
Details: Your firm is hiring a new marketing manager. You and one of the other senior managers have been interviewing candidates.
A candidate just completed the interview process and has the following skills, background and characteristics:
Masters Degree in Marketing
Extensive and positive references
Worked in a similar position with a competitor for the past 20 years
You are very pleased with this candidate and feel she meets and exceeds all the requirements for the position. Your co-worker, the other manager, disagrees and rejects the candidate. When you ask "why," he refuses to provide specific rationale and only states that he does not think this person is a good fit and that the search should continue. You repeatedly press the issue to find out why; however, your fellow manager will not divulge or discuss any of his rationale and simply repeats he does not think this candidate is a good fit.
1-Which type(s) of heuristic(s) may be present in formulating your co-workers opinion? Explain how you came to your conclusions (support your findings).
2-Are there possible legal and ethical implications that can result from making a hiring decision based on your co-workers opinion?
3-After your analysis for parts 1 & 2 (above) what would you say to your co-worker and what would you need to tell him to persuade and convince him that this person is right for the job and should be hired? Your goal here is to "persuade."View Full Posting Details