Purchase Solution

Logical reasoning

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Sharky, a leader of the underworld, was killed by one of his own band of four henchmen. Detective Sharp interviewed the men and determined that all were lying except one. He deduced who killed Sharky on the basis of the following statements:

a. Socko: Lefty killed Sharky.
b. Fats: Muscles didn't kill Sharky
c. Lefty: Muscles was shooting craps with Socko when Sharky was knocked off.
d. Muscles: Lefty didn't kill Sharky.

Who did kill Sharky?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Preview

Suppose Socko is telling the truth. This means that Fats, Lefty and Muscles are lying.
Since Socko is telling the truth, Lefty killed Sharky.
But we assumed that Fats was lying, therefore Muscles killed Sharky.
Hence we get a contradiction. Therefore Socko was not telling the truth and he was lying. Therefore we conclude that Lefty did not kill Sharky.

Now suppose that Fats is telling the truth and Socko, ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Solving quadratic inequalities

This quiz test you on how well you are familiar with solving quadratic inequalities.

Graphs and Functions

This quiz helps you easily identify a function and test your understanding of ranges, domains , function inverses and transformations.

Geometry - Real Life Application Problems

Understanding of how geometry applies to in real-world contexts

Exponential Expressions

In this quiz, you will have a chance to practice basic terminology of exponential expressions and how to evaluate them.

Probability Quiz

Some questions on probability

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Moral Values and Moral Reasoning Process

    What differences did you notice between your logical reasoning process and your moral reasoning process?

  • Logical Fallacies/Critical Thinking Skills?

    Another reason to engage in logical fallacies is deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is based on logical presuppositions - assertions which may be true or false (p.456).

  • Common Approaches to Reasoning

    We all have the ability to use logical reasoning; can share an understanding of fundamental logical rules and methods of reasoning however, do not all share the same strengths related to both deductive and inductive reasoning.

  • How Do We Identify Illogical Arguments?

    The Greeks often utilise the rules of fallacies, as Aristotle pointed out when deconstructing the reasoning of orators and politicians. Now, let us talk about logical arguments. What is a logical argument?

  • Cognitive science: Neuroscience and Philosophy

    between logical and non logical and illogical processes in reasoning.

  • Inductive Reasoning vs. Deductive Reasoning

    In this particular task, you are asking for help in discussing induction & deduction as logical positions. I suggest using this simple outline: 1. About Logical reasoning - 100 words 2.

  • Logical, Creative and Scientific Thinking

    Often the use of logical thinking and logical reasoning as used in scientific thinking requires a struggle with the will, because logic sometimes forces one to deny one's emotions and face reality, and this is often painful.

  • Evaluating Arguments

    Logical reasoning is the process which uses arguments, statements, premises and axioms to define weather a statement is true or false, resulting in a logical or illogical reasoning.

  • Logical Fallacies in an Individual's Justification

    Some logical fallacies are more common than others and are often referred to as well-known errors of reasoning.

  • Assumptions, Critical Thinking and Logic

    Two methods of logical reasoning are deductive and inductive reasoning: (a) Deductive: Facts, certainty, syllogisms, validity, truth of premises sound arguments & conclusions, and (b) Inductive: Diverse facts, probability, generalizations, hypotheses

View More Related Solutions