Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Title VII and Employment Law

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Please help with the following problem found in the textbook: Business Law: The Ethical, Global, and E-Commerce Environment 13th edition written by Jane Mallor, A. James Barnes, Thomas Bowers, and Arlen W. Langvardt (2007).

    Please answer question in detail.

    CASE

    Ann Hopkins, a senior manager at the accounting firm of Price Waterhouse, was denied partnership in the firm. A persistent theme in existing partners' written comments on Hopkin's candidacy was the belief that Hopkins acted in ways inappropriate for a woman to act. Thus, one partner described her as "macho," another wrote that she "overcompensated for being a woman," yet another advised that she take "a course at charm school," and still others objected to her use of profanity. Also, a partner who tried to help Hopkins through the process told her that to improve her chances, she should walk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear makeup, have her hair styled, and wear jewelry. Assuming that these opinions were the only reason for Hopkins's failure to make partner, was that denial illegal sex discrimination under Title VII?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 9, 2019, 11:05 pm ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/business/business-law/title-vii-employment-law-243775

    Solution Preview

    Yes, the denial was illegal discrimination as per Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As per this act, it is illegal to discriminate in any aspect of employment, be it promotion or any other terms and conditions of employment, on the basis of sex or gender. In this ...

    Solution Summary

    Assuming that these opinions were the only reason for Hopkins's failure to make partner, was that denial illegal sex discrimination under Title VII?

    $2.19