What are the physiological challenges an organism (such as a waterbug) might experience in a freshwater lake of the following conditions: depth of 200 m, water cold (approx 10 degrees celcius on surface), eutrophic, poor visibility, pH approx. 4?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 24, 2018, 6:17 pm ad1c9bdddf
What are the physiological challenges an organism (such as a waterbug) might experience in a freshwater lake of the following conditions: depth of 200 m, water cold (approx 10 degrees Celsius on surface), eutrophic, poor visibility, pH approx. 4?
The key to answering this question is to think about the stresses that these conditions would put on an aquatic insect. These stressors could be things that decrease the organism's ability to capture prey or escape from predators or things that alter the organism's homeostasis. Let's look at each condition separately:
Freshwater: When an organism lives in water osmosis and ion transfer is going to occur between the external environment and the organism's cells, until the two environments are isotonic (same concentration of water and ions inside and out). Most organisms' cells can only operate correctly and/or survive in a limited range of osmolarities. When exposed to external conditions not appropriate to their cells they can do a few things: 1. move, 2. osmoregulate (usually through ionic pumps), 3. become isotonic with the environment and deal with it. To address this question specifically you want to find out the osmotic requirements of the waterbug. It is likely that its cells are isotonic to freshwater and then there would be no osmotic and ionic stress, however if there was a ...
In this solution I describe how/why each condition could (depth, temperature, eutrophic level, pH, and visibility) physiologically stresses a waterbug, including definitions of terms and physiological theory.
Biology and Society
Please help with the following questions.
Chapter 2: Biology and Society, Question 14, p.34-
? One solution to the problem of acid precipitation caused by emissions from power plants is to use nuclear power to produce electricity. The proponents of nuclear power contend that it is the only way that the United States can increase its energy production while reducing air pollution, because nuclear power plants emit little or no acid-precipitation-causing pollutants. What are some of the benefits of nuclear power? What are the possible costs and dangers? Do you think we ought to increase our use of nuclear power to generate electricity? Why or why not? If a new power plant were to be built near your home, would you prefer it to be a coal-burning or nuclear plant? Why?
Chapter 3: Biology and Society, Question 15, p.53-
? Each year, industrial chemists develop and test thousands of new organic compounds for use as pesticides, such as insecticides, fungicides, and weed killers. In what ways are these chemicals useful and important to us? In what ways can they be harmful? Is your general opinion of pesticides positive or negative? What influences have shaped your feelings about these chemicals?
Chapter 4: Biology and Society, Question 12, p.71-
? Doctors at a university medical center removed John Moore's spleen, which is standard treatment for his type of leukemia. The disease did not recur. Researchers kept the spleen cells alive in a nutrient medium. They found that some of the cells produced a blood protein that showed promise as a treatment for cancer and AIDS. The researchers patented the cells. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled against Moore, stating that his lawsuit "threatens to destroy the economic incentive to conduct important medical research." Moore argued that the ruling left patients "vulnerable to exploitation at the hands of the state." Do you think Moore was treated fairly? Is there anything else you would like to know about this case that might help decide?
Chapter 5: Biology and Society, Question 14, p.87-
? Lead acts as an enzyme inhibitor, and it can interfere with the development of the nervous system. One manufacturer of lead-acid batteries instituted a "fetal protection policy" that banned female employees of childbearing age from working in areas where they might be exposed to high levels of lead. Under the policy, women were involuntarily transferred to lower-paying jobs in lower-risk areas. A group of employees challenged the policy in court, claiming that it deprived women of job opportunities available to men. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the policy illegal. Nonetheless, many people are uncomfortable about the "right" to work in an unsafe environment. What rights and responsibilities of employers, employees, and government agencies are in conflict in this situation? Whose responsibility should it be to determine what makes a safe environment and who should it be to determine what makes a safe environment and who should or should not work there? What criteria should be used to decide?
Thank you for your help in advance!View Full Posting Details