Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Feeding efficiency calculation- surface area to volume ratio

    Not what you're looking for? Search our solutions OR ask your own Custom question.

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Consider two imaginary cells. Both are cube shaped (the same dimension in all directions) The first cell has a side length of 10 micrometers. The second has a side length of 100 micrometers. Calculate the surface areas and volumes of both of these cells then calculate the sa/v for each of them. The SA, V and Sa/V dived out of each of theses cells. which one of these would be most efficeint at feeding itself? Why? If we added a third cell with a side length of 50 micrometers how would its feeding efficiency compare to our first two cells ( no calculations needed) Why ?

    Finally if our least efficient cell needed to increase its feeding effiency to match the most efficient cell what is one way it might do it? Oh - that's without actually changing its volume. Be specific about how the cell must change.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com September 28, 2022, 2:24 am ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    please see the attachment for the solution to this problem.

    --------- Text below for searching only-------


    The side length of the first cell = 10 micrometers.
    Since the cell is of cubic shape, its surface area (SA) is given by 6a2 where a is the side length of the cube.
    Therefore, the SA of the first cube = 6x(10x10-6 )2 (1 micrometer =10-6 meter )

    =6x10-10 m2

    Volume of the cell (V) = a3 = (10x10-6 )3 = 10-15 m3

    for the first cell , Surface Area/Volume = SA/V =6x10-10 /10-15

    = 6x105 per meter

    Similarly, for the second cell whose side length = 100 micrometers,

    Surface Area = 6x(100x10-6 )2 = 6x10-8 m2 ...

    Solution Summary

    The solution shows all mathematical steps to arrive at the final answer. This will enable you to solve similar problems yourself. More than 350 word explanation as a Word attachment.