Can you compare three theoretical perspectives on human development? Include any similarities and differences between and among these theories. Which explain(s) development best and why, providing evidence. Explain relations to constructive developmental theory.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 6:58 am ad1c9bdddf
(1) Compare three theoretical perspectives on human development. Include any similarities and differences between and among these theories
(a) Attachment Theory of Human Development
In his study of mothers and their interactions with their children, Bowlby (1973 as cited in Brandell (2010) proposed that children develop internal working models of interpersonal expectations that influence all of their later relationships. For example, an individual with warm, loving parents would have a secure attachment style. On the other hand, Mikulincer (1998a) posited that an individual with low self-esteem and who lacks interpersonal trust will have a fearful-avoidant attachment style. Further, attachment-anxiety denotes sensitivity to abandonment, fears of rejection, and links with other relational strategies. For instance, attachment-avoidance is characterized by a discomfort with closeness. According to Brandell, attachment is the driving force of development.
(b) Theory of Cognitive Development
Recent research has pointed to a strength in Piaget's theory of cognitive development in demonstrating that self-organizing genetic processes are associated with neural networks that are necessary for cognitive development (Brennan, 2002). For example, Piaget's (1953) theory of infant development sought to explain how children construct their knowledge. Piaget hypothesized that childhood development occurs in three stages: (a) sensorimotor stage ...
This solution provides theoretical perspectives in human developmen focused on similarities and differences.
Journal Review - Human Resources Development Research
Students will write a two page summary of a business journal article. The summary should thoroughly address each of the following:
1. Title, Author (s), Journal, Date, Volume, Number, Pages.
2. Introduction. What basic question is the investigator trying to answer? Why?
4. What or who are the participants?
5. What task do they perform or what tests do they take, or what characteristics are measured?
3. Results. What were the main findings in the study?
Discussion. In general, what did the study demonstrate? What are the implications of study? What questions remain for further research?
Criticisms. Point out at least two weaknesses in the research. Explain these criticisms thoroughly.
Post your Journal Review as a word document or text file.