1 and 1/2 pages
a. critically evaluate Thomas argument from necessity in the terms of validity and soundness.
how does it turn on the validity of the Aristotelian princle of ' no infinate Regress'?
<br>First of all, you need to set out the argument from necessity. Summaarised (you probably want to add some quotations from the Summa) it is as follows:
<br>1. Since things are generated, it is possible for them to be or not be.
<br>2. Since things are countable, they are finite in number.
<br>3. If, for all things, they do not exist at some time, then given infinite time, there would be nothing in existence. (Nothing can come from nothing.)
<br>4. But many things exist.
<br>Therefore, a Necessary Being (i.e., a Being of which it is impossible that it should not exist) exists.
<br>Evaluating something for validity involves ensuring that the argument follows from the premise; evaluating it for soundness involves evaluating the premise to see if it is indeed correct.
<br>1 & 2 are the premises from which Aquinas draws 3, 4, and then his ...
Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Catholic Church
Saint Thomas Aquinas struggled with the question of "What is God?" Discuss Saint Thomas Aquinas and the five main premises of his argument for the existence of God?. How does the Catholic Church deal with his views?View Full Posting Details