Purchase Solution

St. Thomas Aquinas "Proofs"

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Describe the nature and utility of St. Thomas Aquinas' "proofs." Do you feel they hold value today; why or why not?

Purchase this Solution

Solution Preview

Aquinas' proofs of the existence of God are cosmological proofs - they rely for their support on observable physics and "real life" phenomena. In this respect they differ from ontological proofs - which rely for their support on logic rather than physics (e.g., "God must exist, because it is inherent in the conception of God that we have that He must exist", "God's existence is self-evident", "God's existence is established by our faith in Him", etc.)
<br>Thus, in order for Aquinas' proofs to have relevance, we must agree that his understanding of the nature of physical reality must have the interpretation he gives it.
<br>The five proofs are, quickly, as follows:
<br> * The "first mover" argument - We observe movement in nature,
<br> movement proceeds in a chain (A causes B to move, B causes
<br> C to move, etc.), there must have been a first mover, that
<br> first mover is God;
<br> * The "first cause" arguemnt - We observe end states (caused
<br> things) in nature, causation proceeds from cause to caused
<br> (A causes B to be as it is, B causes C to be as it is, etc.),
<br> the first causer is God;
<br> * The "necessary being" argument - We ...

Purchase this Solution

Free BrainMass Quizzes
Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy

Short quiz relating to Descartes

The World Health Organization

This quiz assesses the students knowledge about the World Health Organization. Although listed under “Philosophy” it is relevant to health care, political science, pre-med, and social scientist students as well.