Purchase Solution

Translation of Sentences into Symbolic Predicate Logic

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

For each of problems,
? Write a symbolic version of the given statement
? Construct a negation of the symbolic statement
? Translate the symbolic negation into good, lucid English.

Problem A: "All the routers in our facility support both hard-wired and wireless Internet connections."
Problem B: "Each of our salespersons has at least one customer that has paid all his invoices on time."
Problem C: "Frank will get a bonus if all of his projects are completed on schedule."

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

We translate various quantified sentences into symbolic predicate logic and form their negations.

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Multiplying Complex Numbers

This is a short quiz to check your understanding of multiplication of complex numbers in rectangular form.

Solving quadratic inequalities

This quiz test you on how well you are familiar with solving quadratic inequalities.

Know Your Linear Equations

Each question is a choice-summary multiple choice question that will present you with a linear equation and then make 4 statements about that equation. You must determine which of the 4 statements are true (if any) in regards to the equation.

Geometry - Real Life Application Problems

Understanding of how geometry applies to in real-world contexts

Probability Quiz

Some questions on probability

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Translation of Math Symbols to English, Logic, Predicate Logic and Simplification

    Write down the symbolic equivalence of ~( x  , P(x)  Q(x) ) ≡ x  , P(x) ~Q(x) ). Translation of math symbols to English, logic, predicate logic and simplification are investigated and discussed. The solution is detailed and well presented.

  • Symbolic Logic : Predicate Logic

    11519 Symbolic Logic : Predicate Logic The asterisk implies a conditional usually indicated by an arrow. The & sign indicates "and". In Aristotelian logic (X)(FX*GX) logically implies (EX)(FX & GX). Is this true in predicate logic?

  • Symbolic Logic : Predicate Logic

    11520 Symbolic Logic : Predicate Logic The sentence below is a theorem of predicate logic. Show that it is by deriving it from the null set of premises. If any "individual" in the domain has a property, then every individual has it.

  • Explanation of traditional/Aristotelian Logic

    Translation of the stylistic variants into standard form may be necessary. Be aware of "ONLY A is B" statements.

  • Symbolic Logic Problem : Proof

    11566 Symbolic Logic Problem : Proof Construct a formal proof which shows that the sentence below is a theorem of predicate logic. *the E's are existential quantifiers (usually designated by backwards E's). the & are "and".

  • Symbolic Logic Problem

    The validity of a symbolic logic expression is investigated. A method of truth table expansions are used.

  • Symbolic Logic Problem : Sentence to Expression

    An argument is transcribed into a symbolic logic expression. The introspectable mental state is analyzed.

  • Subjects and Predicates

    In this solution we identify the simple subject and simple predicate within a series of sentences.

  • Gerhard Gentzen

    In paper #3, Gentzen breaks free from the formulations of logic given by Frege, Russell and Hilbert by introducing natural deduction and sequent-style systems for predicate logic.

View More Related Solutions