Purchase Solution

Criminal Investigation of Amanda Knox and Michael Kay

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

The cases of Amanda Knox and Michael Kay offer good opportunities to compare criminal justice systems. Both were young U.S. citizens accused of crimes in other countries. These cases illustrated the differences between the U.S. criminal justice system and those of other nations.

Consider such factors as pretrial release, burden of proof, right to appeal, and type of punishment.

In essay form What were the alleged crimes involved? Summarize both the cases.
Did the court system use an adversarial or inquisitorial method? Explain.
What were the final outcomes of the cases? Provide a legal ground for the outcome and justify your answer with appropriate research and reasoning.
In what ways did the process differ from how it would have occurred in the United States?
In what ways was the process similar to that in the United States? Explain with proper reasoning.

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

The solution discusses a criminal investigation of Amanda Knox and Michael Kay.

Solution Preview

In essay form What were the alleged crimes involved? Summarize both the cases.

Amanda Knox was accused of being involved in a murder of a fellow college student whom was her roommate. She and her boyfriend were alleged to have participated in the gory murder while engaging in a sex orgy with another defendant in the alleged murder. The details of why the murder occurred are steeped in the notion by the prosecution that the alleged murderers were high on drugs and fueled by a drug induced haze that resulted in the sex orgy getting out of hand. The prosecution alleges that the victim of the murder wasn't a willing participant in the orgy, which is what prompted the alleged murderers to murder her.

Michael Fay was accused of vandalism while in Singapore. The case involved Kay as an expatriate who allegedly was involved in vandalizing cars in addition to stealing road signs. The suspect confessed to the crime and was sentenced to a controversial sentence of caning that was given by the Courts wherein he would receive 6 strikes by a cane for his offenses as required by the Vandalism Act passed in the country.

Did the court system use an adversarial ...

Solution provided by:
  • Associates of Arts , Lone Star Community College
  • Bachelor of Science , Sam Houston State University
  • Masters of Science, Kaplan University
  • Masters of Science , Kaplan University
Recent Feedback
  • "Thank you however I have two questions: 1.) where in this passage is the actual problem statement? 2.) if you used references can you please provide them? This is great work and I am so grateful. "
  • "Thank you very much"
  • "excellent analysis"
  • "graet job very helpful"
  • "Thank you, excellent and very detailed."
Purchase this Solution

Free BrainMass Quizzes
Criminal Defenses Review

Test your knowledge of the basics of criminal law and defenses with this quiz.


Do you know your evidence objections? Find out with this quiz!

Constitutional Law Rights

How much do you know about Constitutional Law Rights? Find out with this quiz!

Title VII Laws

Learn the basics of the laws under Title VII.

Contract Requirments

How much do you know about the legal requirements for a contract? Find out with this quiz!