I chose to write about the following ethical issues in healthcare:
-Foregoing curative medical treatment due to religious beliefs
I have to provide the history of the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective. I also have to address the following questions:
-Do the consequences of actions always direct what is morally required?
-What should happen when two principles come into conflict? For example, should patient autonomy be considered more important than beneficence? Defend your position.
-Are moral and ethically rules always binding, or are they only guidelines to be assessed in each case? Defend your position.
Starting by defining 'religion,' is helpful. In some circles alternative medicine is well-established, powerful and common. Intertwined in this mindset are meditation and a type of spirituality, healing with energy forces and related content. Additionally, Indian culture has a very grounded spirituality and healing mindset. Native American, peoples of India and indigenous people of Australia utilize centuries-old healing, herbs, spiritual philosophies and natural remedies that other societies follow, ...
The topic of bypassing medical treatment due to religion is discussed. Approximately 300 word response.