I really need help analyzing this problem.
Go to thenewamerican.com; click on subject index, click on capital punishment. Evaluate "Ten Anti-Death Penalty Fallacies" Draft a one page essay in which you cite examples of both strengths and weaknesses in the document's argument against abolishing capital punishment (you will be evaluating the doc's "Corrections)"; and provide an evaluation of its overall effectiveness.
Please see the attachment for a copy of the article. To start let's make an outline of this one page critic.
-One sentence intro about the controversy of the death penalty and the abundance of articles for and against it
-One sentence introducing the article and who it was written by, possibly why
-One sentence saying that this paper has some strengths and weakness when it comes to debating the issue
-Points out the misrepresentation of racism in the application of the death penalty
-Points out the flawed terminology in labeling all over-turned death penalty sentences as judicial errors as some are due to new evidence and changes in ideology
-Good arguments that punishment by death is not an advocation of killing in general
-Overall good arguments against the necessity of society to 'forgive'
Several paragraph examining the strengths and weaknesses of an article about "Ten Anti-Death Penalty Fallacies".