In some of the literature, there is the inference that general/technical management roles are somehow different and inferior to leadership functions. Management and leadership are very definitely not mutually exclusive functions, although the attributes and skills emphasized differ. The best possible scenario for an organization would be to have technically proficient managers with strong leadership skills.
If in a hypothetical situation your company was able to hire only either technically sound managers with weak leadership skills OR strong leaders with less knowledge/interest in routine management, which would you opt for and why?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 3:58 am ad1c9bdddf
Choosing Between Leaders and Managers
In an ideal situation, both managers and leaders would complement each other in an organization. Leadership cannot replace management; it should be an addition to management. However, in this hypothetical situation, we are asked to choose between technically sound managers with weak leadership skills and strong leaders with less knowledge/interest in routine management. We will base our decision on looking at both roles separately so that we can understand clearly why we are choosing one over the other.
Who are managers? "Management can be defined as the attainment of an organizational goal in an effective and efficient manner through planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling organizational resources" (Daft, 2005, p. 16). It focuses on establishing detailed plans and schedules for achieving specific results, then allocating resources to accomplish the plan.
Managers maintain a degree of stability, predictability and order through efficiency with subordinates. They help the organization consistently achieve short term results and meet the expectations of all stakeholders. Some characteristics of managers are:
?Plan and budget - focus on the bottom line
?Based on formal authority
?Organize and staff; direct and control; create ...
The solution lists the differences between sound managers with weak leadership skills OR strong leaders with less knowledge/interest in routine management. It outlines the reasons why one would be better than the other in a hypothetical situation where a company was able to hire only one of them.
Management: Team function, listening form of communication
Leadership (both group and team) are directly linked to the observation, diagnosis, internalization, and creation of strategies to address the forces that challenge and form the organization. Effective teams work with organizational issues and opportunities to achieve the desired future direction. Design and construct teams must function in a way that is consistent with the organization's mission, vision, values, context and strategy.
1. Do you think your team is functioning in a way that is consistent with your organization's mission, vision, values, context and strategy. Why or why not?
2. Do you consider that listening is part of communication? Why or why not? support your response with references.
3. Do Leaders communicate with teams differently if they view themselves as directors vs. facilitators? If so, what does this difference look like in the everyday workplace?
4. How do leaders apply communication dynamics to the execution of organizational strategy?
5. Elaborate on the following statement: "Leader's behavior and integrity impacts positively or negatively organizational strategies, vision and innovations." Support your response within references.
'Studies have shown that words account for 7% of the information communicated' (Team Coordination Training Student Guide, 1998). Therefore, in order to achieve effective communication the presenter must ask for feedback.
6. Based on the description above what skills can you share with us regarding achieving effective communication.View Full Posting Details