Explore BrainMass

Two Poorly Functioning Teams

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

1. Enlist the multiple factors that caused the poor functioning of each group.
2. According to Tuckman's five stages of group development conflict occurs as the second stage after the orientation phase in ordinary groups. Compare the two groups in respect to the conflict process that took place in each using the Tuckman's as a framework.
3. For each group, suggest a resolution to the conflicts and explain why you think it is going to be effective.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:54 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Step 1
The multiple factors that caused the poor functioning of the first group were that there were too many leaders, there was little initiative, and the leader did not perform the role of guiding the group. The venue was selected unilaterally, and conflict occurred in the group. There was too nice syndrome, lack of commitment, and low awareness of group dynamics. The multiple factors that cause poor functioning of the second group were the emergence of two leaders, the norms and communicating were not clear. Only two members of the group were aware of group dynamics, even though conflict was present it was not expressed and the TooNiceSyndrome dominated, ...

Solution Summary

This solution explains two groups affected by conflict and poor performance. The sources used are also included in the solution.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Personnel in Technology: what it takes to build an effective technology support team

Personnel in Technology Paper

View Full Posting Details