Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Employment Law for Human Resource Practice

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Read the Hoffman v. Caterpillar case. What were the two legal issues in this case? What did the court decide? For each issue, explain the issue and give the rationale/analysis and the conclusion reached by the court (in your own words). Was it decided fairly, in your opinion? Why, or why not? What, if anything, should the employer have done differently?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 7:38 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/business/business-law/employment-law-for-human-resource-practice-589513

    Solution Preview

    The two legal issues in this case were whether denial of training must result in a materially adverse employment action and whether the plaintiff suffered disparate treatment as a result of the actions of the company. The Court vacated the original district court's decision regarding the disparate treatment claim predicated upon a ruling that "denial of training" represents an explicitly prohibited action under the ADA wherein a plaintiff is not required to show that the denial of training ...

    Solution Summary

    This solution discusses the legal issues in a case (Hoffman v. Caterpillar).

    $2.19