Explore BrainMass

US Exporting banned pesticides: Opinion

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

I need perfect guidance with a minimum of 250 words with references for extending and further research... Thanks.

U.S. companies export pesticides that have been banned or restricted in this country. Should this practice be allowed to continue? Please give a specific answer and support your rationale or logic.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 7:42 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Dear Student,
Hi and thank you for using Brainmass. In this particular task, you are being asked to provide an opinion on pesticide restriction in the US & their exportation. Essentially, your outline should be simple and concise. I suggest this -

1. About pesticide restriction & exportation - 100 words
2. Your opinion and defense - 150 words

This way, you give background info on the situation in question before you provide your opinion. You can use the listed resources to further explore the topic. A word-version of the solution is also attached. Good luck with your studies.

AE 105878/Xenia Jones

About US Pesticide Exportation

All pesticides and related products sold for use in the US are regulated by the EPA - the US Environmental Protection Agency. Their effects, toxicity, control - they must ...

Solution Summary

The solution provides information, assistance adn advise in tacking the task (see above) on the topic of pesticides and their exportation in relation to the case of companies in the US that export pesticides and chemicals that are banned in the US. The practice is discussed and an opinion and reasons in support of it is provided. Resources are listed for further exploration of the story.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Ethics case: Made in the U.S.A., Dumped in Brazil, Africa


1.) Was the dumping in this case ethical? Those involved in the dumping might have argued that the people receiving the pajamas would not have otherwise had access to such clothing and were notified of the health and safety hazards. Does this affect your feelings about the case? What do
you think about the exportation of the Dalkon Shield? Can it be justified the rate of dying during childbirth in Third World countries is extremely high, and, as such, any effective birth control device is better than none?

2.) What obligations did the financial managers have to their shareholders to do whatever is possible to avoid major financial losses associated with
these products?

3.) Is it still immoral or unethical to dump goods when doing so does not violate any U.S. laws? How about when those receiving the goods know the dangers? Why do you think dumpers dump? Do you think they believe what they are doing is ethically acceptable?

Please see attached case study.

View Full Posting Details