Explore BrainMass

Article Review: Content & Presentation

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Please see attachment. Thanks for all your help.

After reading the article assess its effectiveness according to APA guidelines.

Q1.Assess in 100 to 150 words the presentation of the material. Is the content formatted clearly, and is it stylistically sound? Does it adhere to APA guidelines for expressing ideas and reducing bias in language?

Q2.Discuss in 250 to 400 words the statistical analyses within the article. Does the article incorporate graphs or tables that facilitate understanding? Are the statistical analyses appropriate for the subject? Are they conducted correctly? Do they support the conclusions reached by the author or authors? Are there additional statistical analyses you may perform on this data to gain further knowledge? Are the statistics misleading or biased?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 1:07 am ad1c9bdddf


Solution Preview

Dear Student,
Hello and thank you for using Brainmass. If you feel that you need to expand on the information provided, may I advise using the listed references? Good luck!

OTA 105878/Xenia Jones

Article Review
Title: Placement stability for children in kinship care
Authors: Eleanor Lutman, Joan Hunt, Suzette Waterhouse


The attached article is a study and assessment of the effectivity of kinship care as a more stable alternative child welfare and care arrangement to foster care. The article is written in a scholarly manner presenting arguments, facts and research to support positions and claims or to argue against misconceptions or findings that either go against claims of benefits of kinship care or support it. The authors are experts in ...

Solution Summary

The solution is a 438-word 2-part Q&A review of the presentation, format & content as well as the statistics used and presented in an attached article (Placement_Stability.pdf) for the purpose of establishing soundness and reliability.

Similar Posting

Articles Analysis Matrix by analyzing the content each article

I am working other projects.

Read the Anderson & Shattuck (2012) and Henson, Hull and Williams (2010) articles on the Week 3 Electronic Reserve Readings list.
Complete the Empirical Research Articles Analysis Matrix by analyzing the content of each article and addressing the points listed on the matrix.
Post the completed matrix to the Assignment Discussion for review by your peers.

Select four published research articles related to your general research interest and field of study. Select two quantitative research studies and two qualitative research studies. You may substitute a mixed methods study for one of the qualitative or quantitative studies. Ensure that each of the studies you selected was published in a peer reviewed journal.

Write a 1,400-to 1,750-literature review in which you analyze each study from Part I and II. Consider following points while constructing a logical and critical literature review.
What is known about the research topic you are interested in? From which angles has this research topic been studied?
What is not known about your topic? How can you justify a new research study from this literature gap?
What germinal theory is related to your topic? How does this germinal theory guide you toward developing a research question that is derived from literature gap?
Which research paradigm serves as the foundation for each of the selected articles?
What questions have you generated from the literature review that might be worth pursuing further?
Review the Week 8 assignment rubric for critical analysis and evaluation as you consider which questions might be worth pursuing further.

View Full Posting Details