You are the police chief of Anywhere, U.S., a mid-sized community. You have worked with your organization to adapt to the changes faced after 9/11. Now you are faced with the closing of a major plant in your town. Almost 1,000 men and women are now unemployed and foreclosed signs are popping up everywhere. People are forced to move into cheaper rental housing and there is a social disorganization crisis. Mixed race and age neighborhoods are reporting higher crime rates, vandalism reports are rising, and DUI arrests are the highest in the state.
Your agency is also struggling with low morale because they see their neighbors losing all they have worked for. You must now work with internal and external forces to help your agency and town ride through this economic crisis.
USE APA FORMAT/USE REFERENCES
Include the following:
1. An analysis of the rising crime rates in your town. What are they and why are they related (or not)?
2. An internal impact analysis. How does the crime rate and economy impact your officers?
3. Four recommendations—2 with community impact and 2 with internal agency impact.
4. A plan of action if these are approved.
5. A list of necessary resources (monetary and otherwise).
Be sure to include references to literature to support your recommendations properly citing sources using APA format.
Hi, and good day!
Okay, so, here is the goal for the assignment. Are you familiar with the Social Disorganizational Theory and Rural Community Changes as it relates to how in recent decades, the growing number of conditions, such as changes to the urban areas that were places that poor families could only afford to live suffered a rate of high residential instability rates. Basically, how will this impact those officers in that area given this change after 911? This means, basically that community influences, such as increasing crimes rates, delinquency, gang communities focusing on urban settings and if there will be increased disruptive social, ...
This solution discusses how to deal with low morale in a community with regards to social disorganization.
Robert Merton Theory
1. There are three independent yet overlapping branches within the social structure. perspective social disorganization theory, strain theory, and culture conflict theory. Discuss the. main focuses of each of these theories (and by 'main focuses" l mean the basic premise of. each theory, assumptions about crime causation, implications for crime' control or prevention, and any criticisms discussed), Which one do you ﬁnd most relevant to U.S. society now, and why do you think so?
2. Describe Robert Merton's theory of social "strain" or "anomie" as it relates to deviant/criminal behavior. Be sure to discuss the place of "conformity" in his theory. How does his theory differ from Durkheim's earlier notion of anomie? Next, based on your own experience, the experiences of someone you know, or even the experiences of notorious/famous persons, describe an individual who fits each of Merton's four (4) modes of deviant "paths" or adaptations to "strain." You must discuss four separate people, ' t
2. Sociologist Robert Agnew's General Strain Theory (GST} helps identify the micro- or individual level influences of "strain.' Describe GST, and then explain how this theory differs from those of Merton-(Strain Theory), and Messeners and Rosenfeld ( Institutional Strain Theory/Relative Deprivation association).
4. Discuss what labeling theory tells us about crime, including a discussion of the concepts of primary and secondary deviance. Do you agree with the major assumptions of labeling theory? Why or why not? Have you (or has someone' you know) ever been given a negative label, and if so, did it-cause you (or that other person) some kind of "social harm"? How did you (or the person) lose the label, or did it become a permanent "marker""that still troubles you/him/her today? On the other hand, what could be an example of the everyday imposition of a POSITIVE l label (for anyone)? Why is it so hard sometimes to successfully impose a positive label on a i -
person who has been previously negatively labeled?