Issue Analysis 17, "Does True Altruism Exist?" located in Taking Sides.3 ed
I need help summarizeing both arguments discussed in Issue 17 and
Evaluate each argument based on the article and some life experiences.
Determine with which concept you agree with and provide the rationale for your determination In reading the articles I agreed with the "Yes" because there are many people who really have good hearts and really dvote their time to helping others.
in 600 words and use 2 peer revied articles APA style citing and referencing
Social Psychology has always been a carrier for the debate concerning altruistic behaviour and personality in individuals. This debate centers on the question regarding the motivation for helping others. The growth and scandals in the world of philanthropy; people donating time and money as tax write-off's and similar issues have only fuelled the debate. As such, whenever the term "altruism" arises; many believe people must have an ulterior motive somewhere at some point; that nothing is ever free. As such the idea faces much critique and scrutiny usually. However, I believe altruism for the sole purposes of wanting to help, because it is the moral thing to do and out of the "goodness of their heart" exist. While some of the research refutes this stance; much of the research supports the fact that true altruism; where individuals are acting only with the goal of benefiting others, and as a part of their nature to be kind; do so and simply just for such reasons.
Proponents (Arguments for believing true altruism exists)
Like many, Batson (1981) and colleagues posit that in fact some people do help for purely altruistic purposes; because they are altruistic in nature; and empathetic. Batson and colleagues posit that empathy is the key factor responsible for altruism and that the main goals for altruistic behaviour are to increase the giver's welfare. Additionally, Batson has concluded that giving of oneself selflessly is derived from the empathy and at times pity that we feel for others. In his research study, participants were told ...
An evaluation of arguments are discussed.
Website Evaluation Paper Argument Development
Website Evaluation Paper
As part of a business, you will write reports that may impact decisions. Having the best information available is important; therefore, knowing how to assess websites is critical. You have been asked to evaluate the quality of one of the following websites. Would you recommend this site as a credible site to someone in your business? Why or why not? What issues should the business keep in mind? Address the topics of currency, authority, objectivity, accuracy, and coverage as well as any other information you think appropriate. Keep in mind that you are critically evaluating how the website you have chosen addresses these areas of concern. You do not just explain what the website has on its pages. You critically analyze how these areas of concern impact your evaluation of the website as a credible resource for your business.
Your Task. This assignment is not a group assignment. Pick one (1) website from the list above. Identify the type of site (advocacy, news, information, e-commerce, personal). Using information available to you, evaluate the site using the criteria to assess a quality Web page?authority, currency, coverage, objectivity, and accuracy.
Take a critical look at the website. Assess the value of the website and answering the question: Would you recommend this website as a valuable source of accurate information? Support your answer. Do not just list what you found at the site, work information about the various topics?currency, authority, objectivity, accuracy, and coverage?into your assessment.
Master Rubric Checksheet
UNK CBT:BD MASTER CHECKSHEET
1. Problem Identification Topic/Problem:
___Clear statement of topic
___Key problem(s) identified
___Sustained throughout paper
2. Argument Development Argument:
___Collection/presentation of research
___ Analysis of research to support the topic
___ Detailed and thoroughly developed
3. Supporting Evidence Supporting evidence:
___Good detail/specificity throughout the paper,
___Directly related to problem/topic
___From a credible source
4. Conclusions Conclusions/Recommendations:
___Address key problems identified
___Follow logic of supporting evidence
5. Consistency with Codes or Universal Ethical Principles Student Code of Conduct/Universal Ethical Principles:
___States code/principle used
___Code/principle consistently applied in analysis
___Recommendation(s) consistent with code/principle used
6. Logical Organization
___Smooth transitions & flow
7. Mechanics Grammar, punctuation, spelling, and other mechanics
__3 errors per page average
__2 errors per page average
__1 error (or less) per page average
8. Writing Writing:
___Appropriate business language.
___Sources are properly cited.
___Appropriate style (formal/informal) and tone (negative/positive)
9. Visual Appearance Appearance:
___Appropriate formatting for tables, graphs, and figures.
___Title page if appropriate.
___Word choice appropriate to the discipline.
___Vocabulary shows business understanding.