An experimental test to detect a particular type of cancer indicates the presence of cancer in 90% of individuals known to have this type of cancer, and in 15% of individuals known to be cancer-free (false positive). One hundred individuals volunteer to take the test. Of the 100, 60 are known to have the cancer, and 40 are known to be cancer-free. If the test indicates that one of the individuals, randomly chosen, has the cancer, what is the probability that he or she is actually cancer-free?
Solution Summary
This is a problem that works with false positive in a cancer test.
Sex Offenders: Social Opinion on False Positives of Recidivism. ... 75% do not. Society, however, has a high rate of tolerance for false positives. Any thoughts? ...
... In total, there will be 54 + 6 = 60 volunteers with positive results, but only 6 are false positives, therefore the probability that a positive test is ...
... e. both increase. Save Answer. 16. What will be the effect on false negatives (FN) and false positives (FP) of setting the cutoff higher than 180 mg/dl? ...
...positive. Of these 98 were false positives. Remember that 9850 in total did not have the disease. ... Of these 98 were false positives. Remember ...
...False Explanation: The alternative hypothesis is the hypothesis that sample observations are ... with replacement from a box of numbered tickets; 276 are positive. ...
... The test has a false positive (says the person has the gene when they don't) rate of 6%, and a false negative rate of 3%. What is the probability that a random ...
... in working capital is an investment, and therefore implies a negative cash flow; a decrease in working capital implies a positive cash flow. a. True b. False. ...
