Defining a group using axioms.

Related BrainMass Solutions

• Many problems on group theory

  ( extra definations required : a for a mod n and (pà?q) = pà? q, so (pà? q) (p à?q ) 5. i. State the axioms defining a group - If (Z, +) is a group, show that it is.

• Vector Spaces and Scalar Multiplication

  Thanks for using BrainMass. 1)Let V be the space of all functions from R to R. It was stated in the discussion session that this is a vector space over R.

• Finite Axiomatic Geometry

  (b) Using models, show that Axiom III is independent of the other axioms.

• Proof without using commutative axioms

  365508 Proof without using commutative axioms How would the following proof be detailed if the commutative axioms did not exist? Explain your answer.

• Construct a geometric model using axioms

  14069 Construct a Geometric Model using Axioms Construct a model that satisfies the following axioms. - 1. There exists at least 1 line. - 2. Every line of the geometry has exactly 4 points on it. - 3.

• Check whether the following sets are groups

  This is NOT a group. Associativity fails. Three examples of sets each equipped with a binary operation checked for being a group with respect to that operation, by checking the axioms directly.

• Z-Modules and Modules Associated with Representations

  we know that 1*a = a for a in the Z-module A. So 2*a = (1+1)*a (in Z we know that 1+1=2...) = 1*a + 1*a = a + a , using distributivity of * over +.

• Application of Set-Theoretic Model of Sequences

  Note also, that the use of "succ n", instead of "n" in the first axiom of the extension, keeps the axiom from defining remainder when its second operand is zero.) Operators are defined using a set-theoretic model of sequences.

• Rings

  The ring axioms for 3Z are trivially satisfied, since they already hold in Z, the ring of all integers. In other words, 3Z is a subring of Z, hence a ring in its own right.