Discuss the philosophical positives and negatives in relation to the governmentâ??s role in social welfare. Include examples of social insurance and public assistance programs, and explain the differences between the two.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 3:31 am ad1c9bdddf
The problems with welfare stems from the poor requiring a certain minimum to live and demanding it from society. This demand for a level of minimum can be changed in its definition and amount according to those
who control society and its economic forces. So this level can be decided by the rich and met by the poor, but it leaves the idea of what is a really productive worker up in the air. This allows their circumstances to become very insecure and they cannot survive without depending on the government unlike our ancestors, who could farm and grow things independently. Also, the lack of clothes, food, and other necessities are considered a horror so it demands the government to step in to save people from this horror. So as one increases(poverty0, the other increases. In addition, there are two motives for working namely the desire to live and the desire to improve ...
Should government be involve in social welfare? Benefits and Disadvantages
Government's involvement in and regulation of employee benefits
Please answer this questions. (Human Resources Questions)
First: Other than the mandates of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and a few other ineffectual reporting and disclosure requirements, benefit programs were practically unregulated by the federal government. Before the major shift that came with the enactment of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, which was primarily aimed at traditional defined benefit (DB) pension plans but applicable to other employer sponsored retirement and benefit programs.
a) What is the government's current role in regulating the administration of employee benefits?
b) Do you think there is too little or too much government intervention? Why?
1-There has been great concern expressed by many about the government's involvement in employee benefits. Is this appropriate in our capitalistic society? Or is the government taking control too far?
Second: There are certain benefits that are legislatively mandated and cannot be altered or dropped by an organization for any reason other than the organization is closing its doors for good! Social Security and Medicare, unemployment insurance, worker's compensation, COBRA and FMLA are all federal and state mandated programs.
a) What do you think determines the types of programs that the government chooses to make mandatory?
b) Do you feel these programs are efficient and effective? Why or why not?View Full Posting Details