Explore BrainMass

Health care informatics- electronic record con article from 2007

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Electronic Records Don't Always Improve Care

Study finds little difference for walk-in doctor visits
By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, July 10 (HealthDay News) -- Electronic health records make little difference in the quality of medical care, at least when it comes to walk-in doctor visits, a new study found. "In clinic visits in which doctors did use and didn't use electronic health records, we didn't find clear evidence that EHR use was associated with better quality," said study lead author Dr. Jeffrey Linder.

But the type of record might affect quality, he added. "In this particular study, we weren't looking at a particular type of electronic health record. But other studies have shown that most of the electronic health records that have been put in place are not much more than a replacement for the paper chart," said Linder, who is an associate physician in the division of general internal medicine and primary care at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. "In light of those findings, this is not that surprising," Linder added. "There's nothing magical about electronic health records. You need to have tools in place that take advantage of technology to show improvements in quality. You need to do additional work instead of just turning on the computer."

Dr. Jay Brooks, chairman of hematology/oncology at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation in Baton Rouge, La, said: "Electronic medical records are tools, and they are a tool that allows you to do the right thing. Whether or not you do the right thing is a separate question. They [the study authors] didn't show that these parameters were met, but at least you know that they weren't met. Don't blast the medical records for that."

Electronic health records have been proposed as a solution to improving health quality in the United States, where an estimated 100,000 deaths from medical errors occur each year. President George Bush has called for electronic health records for most Americans and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has a 10-year plan to computerize health care.

To see if electronic health records, as they are used now, had an effect on quality, Linder and his colleagues reviewed ambulatory care visits to non-federally funded, community, office-based physician practices throughout the United States. Then the researchers cross-referenced these visits with 17 ambulatory quality indicators.

Overall, there was no difference in performance between ambulatory visits with and without use of electronic health records. However, visits to medical practices using electronic health records performed slightly better on two indicators: avoiding tranquilizers for patients with depression and avoiding routine urinalysis during general medical examinations.

Electronic health records were associated with a lower quality of care when it came to prescribing the cholesterol-lowering drugs statins to patients with high cholesterol. The new findings, published in the July 9 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine , don't necessarily fly in the face of previous research, the study authors stated. "A lot of that research has been done in small geographic areas, maybe even a single clinic, and focused on a narrow set of quality measures," Linder said. "When you do that, it's much easier to show improvements versus our broad look." But lasting improvements are going to take more than just technological advances, he said. "I'm a fan of electronic health records, and I do think they are part of the solution to improving the quality of care in the United States," Linder said. "But it's going to take a change in medical culture -- doctors, health systems, patients and payers that are all focused on quality. All of the participants should be working to have a health system that is focused on and rewards providing quality care. Part of the solution is to change health-care financing that pays for high quality care, not just more care."

More information
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has more on health information technology.
SOURCES: Jeffrey A. Linder, M.D., associate physician, division of general internal medicine and primary care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and assistant professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Jay Brooks, M.D., chairman of hematology/oncology, Ochsner Health System, Baton Rouge, La.; July 9, 2007, Archives of Internal Medicine
Copyright © 2007 ScoutNews, LLC . All rights reserved.URL:http://www.healthscout.com/template.asp?id=606255

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 11:57 am ad1c9bdddf


Solution Preview

Electronic Records Don't Always Improve Care

Study finds little difference for walk-in doctor visits
By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

When was this report written? I ask because it lists George Bush as the impetus for electronic medical/health records ("EMR's" or "EHR's"). As you can tell from this report, the impetus was political and not medical. Obviously, the quality of medical care depends on the physicians and nurses and not on whether the chart is hand-written, transcribed, or electronically created. I think Dr. Linder is trying to say the same thing.

As Medicare and Medicaid have expanded, so has the need to hold providers accountable for their services. If the government is going to pay for those services, then they can pretty much demand anything. The centers for Medicare and Medicaid have offered incentives to get physicians to go entirely electronic (there is one exception I will talk about later). The incentives have so far been carrots: first we got money to use e-prescribing. Then we were enticed to provide certain information about patients that proved we ...

Solution Summary

The solution discusses the electronic record con article from 2007.

Similar Posting

Prepare a list of 30 to 50 scholarly journal articles that relate to your research question.

Please find sample attached.

Prepare a three to four page list (thirty to fifty sources) of scholarly journal articles that relate to your research question. (Any business research question). These should be listed following the APA Publication Manual, 6th Edition. You need to ensure that you are using scholarly, peer-reviewed journals for you reference list. You need to visit the section of Webliography that covers the differentiation of peer reviewed/scholarly journals from other sources. Be sure to include journals that present multiple sides of the questions, both pro and con. You should plan on having three to four pages of journals in your bibliography. These will be graded on your adherence to APA Style, utilization of peer-reviewed journals, and the adequacy with which they fairly represent the views on the subject.

If you use the Library databases, you can usually check a box in the search criteria to get scholarly results. You can also check the information on the journal to see if it is a scholarly journal, a trade journal, or a popular press publication. You may use up to 10% from non-scholarly sources. Books are not considered to be scholarly sources for this class. It is not that they are not important sources, but they don't usually go through the peer review process and are generally based on older information.

View Full Posting Details