Explore BrainMass
Share

Literature Reviews

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

What are Common Practices to avoid when writing literature reviews because they are forms of plagiarism? What should be done instead:

According to Gall, Borg, and Gall (1996), the most frequent mistakes in reviewing literature are:

- The literature review does not relate to their study.
- Does not take time to define best descriptors and best resources to use in review literature related to one's topic.

See attachment for full document

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 6:02 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/education/schools-communities/literature-reviews-445308

Attachments

Solution Preview

What are common practices to avoid when writing literature reviews because they are forms of plagiarism?

According to Gall, Borg, and Gall (1996), the most frequent mistakes in reviewing literature are:

- The literature review does not relate to their study.
- Does not take time to define best descriptors and best resources to use ...

Solution Summary

What are common practices to avoid when writing literature reviews because they are forms of plagiarism?

According to Gall, Borg, and Gall (1996), the most frequent mistakes in reviewing literature are:

- The literature review does not relate to their study.
- Does not take time to define best descriptors and best resources to use in review literature related to one's topic.
- Does not use primary sources, use mostly secondary sources.
- Uses another's research data as valid without validating the research
- Does not report search procedures used in the review of the literature.
- Reports isolated statistical results than synthesizing them by chi-square or meta-analytic methods.
- Does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretation in synthesizing quantitative literature.

What should be done instead:

- All literature reviews should incorporate literature that is relevent to your study.
- Best descriptors and best resources should be indentified .
- Use primary resources instead of secondary sources.
- Valid all research conducted.
- Synthesize all results using the chi-square or meta-analytic method.
- Consider all research finding in synthesizing your quantitative literature.

References

Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Education research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Please help me with an outline for a literature review.

Conduct a systematic literature review to critically examine a mental disorder that occurs in adolescence. Examine the existing body of scientific evidence on diagnosis and treatment and provide a summary of the evidence that is theory driven and research based. The scientific review of the literature will identify the best practice and provide evidence for effective decision making to improve quality and effectiveness in care of adolescents experiencing the mental disorder. Addressing diagnosis and treatment of the mental disorder in adolescence.

View Full Posting Details