Sovereign identity analysis

Solution Preview

Sovereign borders are meaningful to states because they allow states to achieve border control which is considered an important exercise of sovereignty. When a state controls its borders it can control the population, it can maintain internal security, and can restrict access to labor markets. Sovereign borders are identified as national borders. It is across sovereign borders that a state possesses the legal right to gain control over the movement of goods and people. For example, if an individual seeks to cross a sovereign border into another country he must have the permission of the country into which he seeks entry. In several cases, he must have a valid visa to get entry. Similarly, when goods enter a sovereign country the goods must have a valid permit to enter the border of the country (1). At the same time sovereign borders are meaningful to states because if military forces enter the border, it is called an invasion. Borders are meaningful because they mark the place where one sovereignty ends and another begins. It is along these lines that the state has a legal right to symbolic representation, it provides the identity of a community through the interaction of its people with other communities. The border does exist on the ground and also in the minds of the people molding how people feel that the country is shaped. Sovereign borders are meaningful also for maintaining the internal security of the country or keeping peace within the borders of sovereignty. This is achieved by keeping the national law and protecting against internal threats. Internal security is maintained by police paramilitary forces and during emergencies by the military.
The right way of conceptualizing sovereignty means a dominant power that rests either with a monarch or with the people and is exercised through the parliament. It also means that the power has controlling influence and freedom from autonomy. For example, the parliament has the authority to make laws that govern the people and enforce the laws. Sovereignty. The wrong way of conceptualizing sovereignty is that it becomes a pretext for irresponsibility by people in power. For example, a rule may use sovereignty to defend its pursuit of the self-interest of the ruler of the people in power. A common example of the wrong way to conceptualize sovereignty is to use the concept of human rights violations, Some examples are that in Russia, Putin invokes sovereignty to remove dissidents, and in other countries, sovereignty is used to perpetrate crude nationalism and defend the indefensible. In Saudi, Arabia sovereignty is invoked to perpetrate brutal practices.

The relationship between national identity, popular sovereignty, and state do not present the best model for political organization. The main reason is that establishing national identity ...