When you have reviewed these materials and done your own research (please be sure to use appropriate citations for any material that you collect on their own), please write a 3-5 page paper addressing the question:
Should municipal Wi-Fi continue to be pursued? If so, should this be left to the private sector, government sector, or both?
Frank Hayes. http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/itgovernment/story/0,10801,106743,00.html?SKC=networking-106743. Big Easy Wi-Fi. ComputerWorld, 12/05/05.
Tim Greene. VON: New Orleans' crime-fighting Wi-Fi network is now the city's lifeline. NetworkWorld.com, 03/16/06.
But more recently the effort to provide free municipal Wi-Fi has fallen on hard times. Municipalities have largely relied upon the
Sam Churchill (2009). Top 10 Municipal WiFi Stories of the Decade. DailyWireless.org. Retrieved November 21, 2012 from http://www.dailywireless.org/2009/12/18/top-ten-municipal-wifi-stories-of-the-decade/.
Christopher Mims (2010). Where's All the Free Wi-Fi We Were Promised? Technology Review. Retrieved November 21, 2012 from http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/mimssbits/25819/.
Geoff Duncan (2009). Philadelphia Buys Earthlink's Failed Municipal Wi-Fi Network. Digital Trends. Retrieved November 21, 2012 from http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/philadelphia-buys-earthlinks-failed-municipal-wi-fi-network/.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:05 am ad1c9bdddf
Should municipal Wi-Fi continue to be pursued? If so should this be left to the private sector, government sector, or both?
Municipal Wi-Fi has proven to be an expensive technology to implement so far for the past decade and even before. Reaching remote areas via Wi-Fi is comparatively unreasonable in terms of monetary value versus the benefits of the technology since cellular data and subscription to data plans are easier maintenance, less costly (both for the business and the consumer), and works well disregarding the many signal barriers in the 'cloud' environment. Public Wi-Fi was supposed to be a 'wireless fantasy land' , however even though independent privately owned organization conducted million dollar market researches and developed technology to develop, install, and implement Wi-Fi in various parts of the country (USA), there has been lack of both immediate ROI as well as long term success and stability. The Wi-Fi in the public domain has not been able to generate any significant value for the citizens or local operations. There have been a few 'not-so-up-to-the-mark' success stories that are still struggling to keep the dream alive.
Building large-scale public Wi-Fi systems is unfeasible as apparent from the many failed projects. For instance, the Earthlink Wi-Fi in the city of Philadelphia that was built to provide the access to city government offices  was a ...
This is a discussion of whether municipal Wi-Fi should be established or not. Various advantages and disadvantages of public wi-fi are outlined in this assignment help.
Article: Google and Apple Know Where You Are
Google and Apple Know Where You Are, Maybe
In April 2011, some interesting discoveries were made regarding location tracking by Apple iPhones and iPads and Google Android smartphones. Pete Warden and Alasdair Allan, British researchers, discovered a file on Allan's iPhone that provided a detailed list of places Allan had visited in the U. S. and United Kingdom over a 300- day period. The file included a time stamp of each location.
Similarly, Duke and Penn State student researchers, with the help of Intel, found that 15 of 30 popular Android apps systematically communicated location information to a variety of ad networks. Those researchers found that some of the apps transmitted location data only when displaying specific ads, while others did so even while the app was not running. On some Android smartphones, the location data was transmitted as often as every 30 seconds.
Well, as you can imagine, this sent the public into an uproar. Google and Apple (if you're using one their smartphones) are tracking my every movement? Those organizations know exactly where I was and when I was there? The outcry was unbelievable.
Apple and Google went silent on the subject for several days, with neither returning phone calls or e- mails or posting any information on their Web sites or blogs.
Senator Al Franken, Democrat from Minnesota, quickly scheduled a hearing of the Judiciary Panel's of the Judiciary Panel's subcommittee on privacy for May 10, 2011. According to Franken, "People have the right to know who is getting their information and how (it) is shared and used. Federal laws do far too little to protect this information. . . . No one wants to stop Apple or Google from producing their products, but Congress must find a balance between all of those wonderful benefits (from devices) and the public's right to privacy." After getting little or no response from either Apple or Google, Franken went on to say, "I have serious doubts those rights are being respected in law or in practice."
At the time, Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple, was on medical leave, and he came back from medical leave to defend Apple's location tracking technology. According to Jobs's right-hand executive Guy Tribble, Apple vice president of software technology, Apple iPhones and iPads only gather location data about nearby cell towers and Wi-Fi hot spots. As he explained, "[Apple] does not share personally identifiable information with third parties for their marketing purposes without customers' explicit consent . . . [and] Apple does not track users' locations. Apple has never done so and has no plans to ever do so." Apple intends to continue sending nearby cell tower and Wi-Fi hot spot location data but will only store that data for 7 days.
Google's long- awaited explanation was similar, with a few twists. Google did admit that Android devices do harvest location data for marketing campaigns. But Google stated that the location-tracking information is not traceable to individual users. Google went on to defend its action in stating that Google does ask Android device owners if they want to turn off the location-tracking feature. According to Alan Davidson, Google's director of public policy for the Americas, " If they opt in, all data is made anonymous."
Questions to Answer:
1. Location-based tracking is common to all smartphones, for good reason or bad. The popular location- based service company Foursquare has an app so you can check in at various locations to receive discounts, become Mayor, and see who else might be there. DealLeak, which aggregates deals from the likes of Groupon and Living Social, needs your location in order to offer local discounts on products and services to you. How many location-based service apps do you have on your smartphone? How often do you use them and why?
3. What about location-based tracking in car systems like GM's OnStar? Those systems know the car's location to give you driving directions and perhaps identify local restaurants or other venues. Are you comfortable with this? When was the last time you bought a paper map? How much do you rely on your car's GPS system?
4. What about smartphone tracking for parents who want to know where their children are and where they've been? Minors under the age of 18 have very few privacy rights, especially when it comes to parents' knowledge of where they are. Are parents going too far in wanting to know where their children are? What are the benefits of such systems for parents? For the children? What does the term " helicopter parent" refer to?View Full Posting Details