Compare and contrast the legislation governing Web accessibility in Europe with that in the US.
(Provide references to the work and add a personal conclusion. References do not count to the total wording count).© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:28 am ad1c9bdddf
Task: Compare and contrast the legislation governing Web accessibility in Europe with that in the US.
Web accessibility refers to the inclusive practice of making websites usable by people of all abilities and disabilities. When sites are correctly designed, developed and edited, all users can have equal access to information and functionality. As an example, when a site is coded with semantically meaningful HTML, with textual equivalents provided for images and with links named meaningfully, this helps blind users using text-to-speech software and/or text-to-Braille hardware. When text and images are large and/or enlargeable, it is easier for users with poor sight to read and understand the content. When links are correctly underlined and coloured, this ensures that color blind users will be able to notice them. When clickable links and areas are large, this helps users who cannot control a mouse with precision. When pages are coded so that users can navigate by means of the keyboard alone, or a single switch access device alone, this helps users who cannot use a mouse or even a standard keyboard. When videos are closed captioned or a sign language version is available, deaf and hard-of-hearing users can understand the video. When flashing effects are avoided or made optional, users prone to seizures caused by these effects are not put at risk. And when content is written in plain language and illustrated with instructional diagrams and animations, users with dyslexia and learning difficulties are better able to understand the content. When sites are correctly built and maintained, all of these users can be accommodated without decreasing the usability of the site for non-disabled users .
In the following, we will discuss the features of web accessibility legislation of US and Europe and we will also compare and contrast them. Let's first ...
The solution discuses the accessibility legislation in Europe and the U.S.
Savannah Engineering: Global approach in HR
With significant operations around the world, Savannah Engineering, Inspection, and Insurance Company (SEIIC) is truly a global company. Its most significant international operations are in the European Union (EU) countries and Asia. Growth in China has been particularly rapid over the last five years. Because of the highly technical nature of its business, SEIIC has had a difficult time getting the people with the right skills in the right places and then keeping their skills up to date. The company has worked hard at identifying and hiring local talent, but the efforts have not been entirely successful. To the extent that it can, it has tried to accommodate local needs in its HRM system. However, it has found it difficult to carry out some of its initiatives because of the different ways of working in different areas. It has been difficult for people who transfer from one area to another to deal with the different HRM policies and procedures.
As a part of the overall review of HRM operations, the company is interested in identifying key factors that differentiate its global and domestic operations and in understanding how it can develop a more global approach to HRM.
With a focus primarily on the EU and Asian areas of operations, identify key factors that SEIIC should pay attention to in revising its approach to HRM. Consider, for example, the cultural, economic system, and legal and labor relations differences, in these areas of operation.
(1) Analyze, identify and discuss at least one factor in each of the areas of cultural, economic system and legal and labor relations differences for EU and Asia.
(2) Analyze and discuss how the differences may affect specific HRM activities such as recruiting and staffing, training and development, compensation, performance management, and labor relations.
(3) Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each approach
(4) Analyze and make a recommendation on whether SEIIC should have a uniform approach to HRM around the globe or a