Purchase Solution

A Strong Central Government

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

The United States, compared to countries like France, does not have a very strong central government. For example, public education in the United States is almost wholly within the domain of local government. In two-pages, discuss whether or not you believe that in the 21st century Washington should have greater power to dictate national policy. Should the federal government be able to override state policies? If you were to amend the Constitution, would you entrust greater powers to Washington DC and less power to the states? Why or why not? Are state and local governments fundamentally equipped to handle the current public policy challenges of today, or do they lack the expertise to adequately address concerns and issues that may have national implications?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

A strong central government are discussed.

Solution Preview

I have attached a word document version of the response.

A Strong Central Government

Will Washington have greater power o dictate national policy? The answer is no. The states' rights versus federal rights have been a fight that has occurred throughout the history of American politics. The debate was discussed as part of the ratification process at a Constitutional Convention in 1787 between the Federalist and Anti-Federalists. This discussion has been debated between political parties and a Civil War. The purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to give the federal government more power as compared to the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution has a balance between states' rights and federal powers. Generally, the states' rights were held in tact with certain limitations. A key limitation is that no state law is superior to the federal law. Also, the federal government has the power to regulate commerce within the United States. The Federalist argued for the powers of the federal government whereas the Anti-Federalist argued against the powers of the federal government and opposed ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist argued that too much power was given to the federal government and taken away from the states. For example, the new powers given to Congress, Senators would have a six year term and the powers of the president. The Federalist argued that the states would hinder developing commerce. More importantly, a strong government would allow the United States to become a world leader. In order to obtain ratification of the Constitution, the Federalist agreed to the Bill of ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Employee Orientation

Test your knowledge of employee orientation with this fun and informative quiz. This quiz is meant for beginner and advanced students as well as professionals already working in the HR field.

Introduction to Finance

This quiz test introductory finance topics.

Change and Resistance within Organizations

This quiz intended to help students understand change and resistance in organizations

Marketing Research and Forecasting

The following quiz will assess your ability to identify steps in the marketing research process. Understanding this information will provide fundamental knowledge related to marketing research.

Basic Social Media Concepts

The quiz will test your knowledge on basic social media concepts.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Importance of Strong Central Government

    countries like France, does not have a very strong central government.

  • Constitutional Convention

    Thus, for our protection and for our stability, we need a strong Central government. Nevertheless, while we have a strong centralized federal government, the states have to be able to retain some rights.

  • Unitary, federal, or confederal forms of government

    He wanted to rebuilt the 'nation' from within and as one and that needed uniformity, a strong central bank, strong central government and a strong socio-political system.

  • Fear of Strong Federal Government in 18th Century

    The solution also discusses about the fears of strong central government even today. 1. Apprehensions of Anti-federalists regarding the establishment of a strong Federal Government 2.

  • Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation

    For example - if the central government were to remain as weak as it was under the Articles of Confederation, it would have been a nearly impossible task to create a strong national defense system.

  • views of the Federalist and Republican parties

    Thank you for using Brainmass. 1 & 2) The Federalists, as a rule, were advocates of a strong central government. They were somewhat pessimistic about human nature and believed that the government must resist the passions of the general public.

  • New Monarchies of Europe

    259424 New monarchies were the rulers of European nations during the 15th century who created a strong central government.

  • Federal Government vs. States's Rights

    Those who supported the Constitution and the new framework came to be known as the federalists, meaning that they supported a strong central government with shared powers between the states and the national government.

  • Russia: Authoritarianism

    It also considers if Russia was destined to return to authoritarianism or some form of very strong central leadership.

  • Comparison between Federalists and Republican Parties

    The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They argued that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people.

View More Related Solutions