Validity is more critical to measurement than reliability. Maybe the validity versus reliability is more context related. In certain situations, you might be more interested in having valid results, such as for a blood sugar (glucose) measurement. That measurement has to be valid otherwise you might under or over dose on insulin which could lead to bigger health issues. But if you are weighing yourself, does it really matter if it's valid as long as the results are reliable and I can tell, relatively speaking, whether I'm getting heavier or lighter? Please comment.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 10:03 am ad1c9bdddf
Validity measures the actual accurateness of the numbers of a test. Reliability measures consistency of a test. For example, if you are stepping on a scale, it matters more if the numbers on the scale are valid rather ...
Discussion of validity versus reliability and whether it's more important for a test to be reliable over valid.
Validity vs. reliability
Imagine that your centre or school is looking for an assessment instrument to measure reading ability. The selection has been narrowed to two possibilities: Test A shows measures of strong validity, but there is no information about its reliability; Test B includes measures of strong reliability, but there is no information about its validity. Which test would you recommend? Be sure to include at least three specific reasons as to why you chose the test you did.View Full Posting Details