Purchase Solution

At 3M, a Struggle between Efficiency and Creativity

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

See attached files for full case study.

1. Describe the nature of incremental innovations derived at 3M through the adoption of the Six Sigma discipline earlier in the decade under the leadership of James McNerney.

2. How is the approach of George Buckley different? Is it more of a breakthrough type approach to invention?

3. Does Buckley's approach involve any outside involvement or openness to outside ideas or outside ventures and acquisitions?

4. Are elements of entrepreneurship present under either leader's approach?

5. Which approach to innovation do you think would be best at 3M?

6. Is it seemingly wise to try to have both Six Sigma and incremental innovation alongside a more open, creative breakthrough innovation approach? What challenges may emerge at 3M in attempting to do this?

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

At 3M, a Struggle between Efficiency and Creativity is discussed in great detail in this solution.

Solution Preview

1. Describe the nature of incremental innovations derived at 3M through the adoption of the Six Sigma discipline earlier in the decade under the leadership of James McNerney.

The nature of incremental innovations derived at 3M through the adoption of the Six Sigma Discipline under the leadership of James McNerney was that he started a series of management techniques that wee designee to reduce production defects and increase efficiency. The purpose was to wield in 3M that had become sluggish, lacked control, and direction. McNerney focused on the efficiency. He managed to get incremental innovations through the DMAIC process that is define, measure, analyze, improve, and control. This process is incremental in nature. In addition, McNerney introduced Design for Six Sigma which systematized a new product development in such a way that the new product was made to Six Sigma specifications from the inception.

2. How is the approach of George Buckley different? Is it more of a breakthrough type approach to invention?

George Buckley's approach is different because he reduced the constraints of Six Sigma from the research labs. The reason was that he wanted creativity to return to 3M. George Buckley however continued with Six Sigma ...

Purchase this Solution


Free BrainMass Quizzes
Balance Sheet

The Fundamental Classified Balance Sheet. What to know to make it easy.

Understanding Management

This quiz will help you understand the dimensions of employee diversity as well as how to manage a culturally diverse workforce.

Learning Lean

This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.

Lean your Process

This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.

Understanding the Accounting Equation

These 10 questions help a new student of accounting to understand the basic premise of accounting and how it is applied to the business world.