Explore BrainMass

The nature of utilizing competency for staffing

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Describe why an organization would choose competency-based job analysis over the more traditional form of job requirement job analysis. What are the pros and cons to each approach?

The attachments are as follows:
- The Nature of Staffing
- Support Activities: Legal compliance, planning, job analysis and rewards
- Support Activities: Planning
- Support Activities: Job Analysis and Rewards

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:08 am ad1c9bdddf


Solution Preview

An organization would choose competency-based job-analysis over the more traditional form of job requirement job analysis because it allows the gathering of a job description that is more flexible and covers a multitude of tasks that may need to be accomplished instead of the traditional way of describing a particular or specific task that comes under a job description. Staffing the company with employees who can contribute to the company with their prior experiences leads to successful and productive experiences that benefit the employee and the present company. The traditional way has a set process of how a task is done ...

Solution Summary

This explains the competency side of staffing and the reasons for it as opposed to the regular resume and background checks.
There are approx 500 words and 1 reference.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Internal/External Selection

Using....Cell Phone Industry , Pharmaceutical, Municipal Government

Identify, compare, and contrast the specific internal and external selection methods used for the occupational groups represented in each industry. What similarities and differences exist across the industries? Can these similarities and differences be attributed to job competencies identified in Week 2 research? How?

Identify and analyze best practices which occur internally and externally for the selection of employees in the occupations represented in the organizations in the three selected industries. Incorporate relevant findings from Week 2 related to specific job competencies across the industries, which impact the selection techniques used in each industry. In particular, explore any notable distinctions in the staffing process, along with job competencies, across industries and for occupations within each industry.

Identify and analyze some of the specific career development initiatives used within each industry and, in particular, discuss how HRD initiatives impact or relate to selection approaches observed across these industries. For example, how might training or other development activities directly influence the approaches to selection?

Explore and contrast the cost and time involved in various identified methods of selection. Contrast the costs and time involved against the validity of each of these methods. Do your findings and analysis map to the findings you have observed across industries? How?

Relate your discussion on various selection methods across industries to the staffing challenges and environmental scanning challenges identified in earlier reports.
Include and integrate at least five recent and industry-relevant, peer-reviewed sources from the South University Online Library and trade publications.

View Full Posting Details