Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    Business Ethics and Consequentialism

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    Case study from the Markkala Center for Applied Ethics and I need assistance formatting a 5-7 page essay.

    The links are provided below for the research

    http://www.scu.edu/ethics/dialogue/candc/cases/supplier.html

    Here is what really happened:

    http://www.scu.edu/ethics/dialogue/candc/cases/supplier_comments.html

    1) Apply Steps A through D of the Utility Test to the above case. Be sure that you carefully document each step in the process.

    2) Choose one of the following five tests: Rights Test, Exceptions Test, Choices Test, Justice Test, or the Common Good Test. Click here: http://ethicsops.com/EthicsTestsLinks.aspx.

    . Now, apply the test you've chosen to the above case. In your paper, be sure that you have fully written to each step in the test you have selected.

    3) Compare and contrast the results you have obtained from the Utility Test (#1 above) and your choice of the five tests (#2 above).

    4) Which approach - the Utility Test (#1 above) or the test you chose (#2 above) is most informative in terms of your evaluation of the Case? Why?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 4:16 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/business/business-philosophy-and-ethics/business-ethics-consequentialism-454200

    Solution Preview

    The Case of the Remaining Transistor Supplier for Pace Makers

    Background

    In the case of The Sole Remaining Supplier Introduced by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
    a company that manufacturers transistors is concerned about its position. The company supplies
    transistors to a manufacturer of pacemakers, which are used to keep individuals' hearts beating
    regularly. The problem is that some members of the board are concerned about the new pacemaker
    technology which has not yet been perfected. Those on the other side of the argument say that as the
    only provider of transistors to the pacemaker producer they are obligated to provide the necessary
    parts, as pacemakers can save lives.

    Application of Utility Test

    In step A of the Utility Test the consequences or outcomes determine what is right or
    wrong. It can be asked whether the company is maximizing benefit and reducing harm in the
    decision making process. Those against supplying the transmitter are concerned about harm. One
    man was able to pull the wire out of the pacemaker with a simple chest movement. The company
    is concerned about liability but also about the potential benefit. If happiness can be measured by
    pleasure and pain then the transistors may lead to more pain than pleasure. Therefore, discontinuing
    sales of the devices to the pacemaker company is less likely to result in pain for the patient whose
    pacemaker malfunctions. If the company retains its positive public image members of the organization
    retain their jobs and provide for their families. If, on the other hand, selling the transistors does more
    good for patients who need pacemakers the company is doing more good by continuing to supply the
    transistors.

    B. WHY IS UTILITY A VALID WAY TO DECIDE RIGHT AND WRONG?

    If the most happiness or the least happiness are considered continuing to supply the transistors
    may be the best decision. Patients will benefit from the pacemakers. Families of the pacemaker
    manufacturer employees will enjoy a better way of life when the company does not fold. The
    employees and families of the transistor supplier will also experience greater happiness. Some family
    members of patients with successfully implanted pacemakers will be happy to see their loved ones
    experiencing better quality of life.

    C. APPLY THE TEST

    STEP 1: Identify the alternative actions that are possible and the persons and groups (the stakeholders)
    who will be affected by these actions.
    Discontinuing sales of the transistor to the pacemaker manufacturer affects: Families and
    employees of the pacemaker manufacturer, possibly families and employees of the transistor
    manufacturer, those who would receive pacemakers and their families, and surgeons and medical staff
    involved in inserting the pacemakers.
    Continuing sales of the transistor will affect the same stakeholder groups.

    STEP 2: For each of the most promising alternatives, determine the benefits and costs to each person
    or group affected. These ...

    Solution Summary

    The business ethics and consequentialism is examined.

    $2.19