Purchase Solution

Negotiation - Coalitions and Multiple Parties

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Q1. What are ways to deal with opposing groups who have more power or leverage?

Q2. Compare and contrast the central route to influence vs. the peripheral route to influence. When is each appropriate? Give an example where you have seen or used each.

Q3. What is the difference between coalitions and multiple parties? How does each affect negotiations?

Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

The expert determines how to deal with opposing groups who have more power or leverage. The central route to influence versus the peripheral routes to influence are compared and contrasted.

Solution Preview

1. The best way to deal with opposing groups and opposing power is to neutralize the field as much as possible, so both sides have as much to gain or lose as the other. If one side has the power of position or rewards and punishments, neutralizing the field might mean making sure that group understands the outcomes can be negative in terms of reputation and future negotiations. Knowledge is another area of power. The best way to neutralize knowledge is to research and make sure everyone understands the information and its value. Knowledge is power can also mean that research into knowing what the other side needs, wants, or will negotiate for is important. Doing as much as possible to make sure both sides have something to gain or lose is the best way to deal with the ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Lean your Process

This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.

Writing Business Plans

This quiz will test your understanding of how to write good business plans, the usual components of a good plan, purposes, terms, and writing style tips.

Business Ethics Awareness Strategy

This quiz is designed to assess your current ability for determining the characteristics of ethical behavior. It is essential that leaders, managers, and employees are able to distinguish between positive and negative ethical behavior. The quicker you assess a person's ethical tendency, the awareness empowers you to develop a strategy on how to interact with them.

MS Word 2010-Tricky Features

These questions are based on features of the previous word versions that were easy to figure out, but now seem more hidden to me.

Employee Orientation

Test your knowledge of employee orientation with this fun and informative quiz. This quiz is meant for beginner and advanced students as well as professionals already working in the HR field.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Negotiations: Coalition and the Roles of Participants

    I would prefer to form a coalition when more than two parties or multiple parties are negotiating with common or overlapping goals and in situations where each party is struggling to achieve their own individual objectives from the negotiation. 2

  • Negotiations and influence of agents and constituencies

    How would you accomplish the following: The prenegotiation, formal-negotiation, and the agreement stage for the multiparty negotiation The strategies used to manage the negotiations The role that coalitions played in the negotiations Part I I

  • Integrative Bargaining and Thompson's Pyramid Model

    This strategy is mutually beneficial for both parties to meet their needs, desires, fears, and concerns. Integrative bargaining is used in negotiations when there are multiple issues involved.

  • The value of principled negotiation

    188842 Value of principled negotiation Draft a paragraph on the value of principled negotiation. The value of negotiation can be determined by understanding that negotiation is a multiple pronged event.

  • Best approach to bargaining

    There is an effort by both parties to create value, there is a need for skillful negotiation, and the interests of both parties must be considered (1).

  • Interest-based vs power- and rights-based negotiations

    They involve looking at the issues being negotiated from multiple angles, considering multiple issues at once (thus allowing for trade-offs), and honestly trying to "expand the pie" rather than divide it.

  • Distributive and Integrative Negotiations

    Through framing, it becomes easy to identify that whether parties are using their forces and resources to win over the situation of negotiation rather than focusing on rights and interests of other parties.

  • Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis

    Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis Negotiation can be described as the bargain at the individual or collective level to gain the advantages and opportunities by satisfying the other parties and solving their issues and problems (Maiese, 2003).

  • Searching for solutions

    Thank you for using BrainMass and have a wonderful day! Karen Coleman Expert ID 107089 This solution discusses the searching for solutions that meet both parties' needs in negotiation.

View More Related Solutions