Explore BrainMass

Changes in families

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

1â?"2 pages
Details: Many experts cite the weakening of the family as one of the causes for some of the problems that society faces today. Do you agree? In your paper, include the following information:

Identify important or significant changes in families since 1960. What factors are responsible for this change?
On the balance, are families becoming weaker or simply different? What evidence can you cite?
If you agree with the experts, what proposals do you have to strengthen the family?
If you disagree with experts, why?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 2:52 am ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Hello. I provide the following to assist you.

I think that the weakening of the family is one of the causes for some of the problems that face society today. I believe this because there are so many problems with the way that society is. Part of the reasoning behind this is that there are so many single parents. Many times young men have no fathers to help them formulate the way that a responsible adult should act. This has caused many young men especially to retreat to negativity.

Further, many changes have occurred since the 1960s. Some of these factors include an increase in single parent homes, many two parent households have both parents working, as opposed to the mother remaining at home to take care of the children. Because of this, unfortunately, many children spend much of their time in day care centers with workers, as opposed to a parent. Furthermore, there is a lot of teenagers having children. This, in many cases means that grandparents are raising their grandchildren as if they were their own children. Unfortunately, this leaves the young individuals ...

Solution Summary

This solution provides an explanation of the changes in the family core.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Couples in Family Psychology

Discuss the selected psychological theories in terms of explaining the psychological underpinnings of each theory.
Trace the evolution of each theory, relating briefly the phases, if any, each theory has undergone over time.
Critical analysis: Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses or benefits and liabilities of utilizing each of the selected therapeutic approaches through support of appropriate sources.
Identify how the scenario selected can be affected by divergent cultures factors.
Part 3 - Application of therapeutic approach: Propose an intervention plan to solving the hypothetical therapy scenario or crisis. Utilizing the selected therapeutic approach, develop a therapeutic intervention plan for the selected scenario.
What issues would you focus on?
What specifically would be the role of the therapist?
What stance would the therapist take with the couple?
What would be the specific goal of the couples therapy?
What assessment and treatment plan would you develop as the therapist, based on the selected therapeutic approach, to assist the couple in the selected scenario?
Conclusion: Summarize and draw conclusions from your discussion. Tie all aspects together and provide the reader with some final thought to consider.

This is the literature review on the case study I will attach

Fife et al. (2013), states that when briefly discussing the strengths and weaknesses of an
approach for treating couples who are struggling with an extramarital affair, the cognitive-
behavioral approach has many inherent strengths. In fact, it can help to foster the process of
healing for couples in therapy. It can also be used to restore trust as the couple works through
the process of forgiveness after infidelity. Mistrust seems to characterize the crisis and the
stages to rebuild consist of four unifying factors, as one source reiterates(Fife,S.R., et al., 2013).

Penn et so. (1997), pinpoint how ͞empathy, humility, commitment and apology͟ (343) are
critical stages. Regarding interventions, establishing boundaries is a major intervention to
rectify the loss of trust. Interventions to enhance both partners' sense of safety and security
can help to use communication as an intervention. The author states that It is also heralded as
quite beneficial in promoting both healing and attachment security after infidelity, as one
source recommends.

Atkins et al. (2005), states that As far as weaknesses, some authors claim that this approach
fails to take culture into account. Experts also criticize that this type can be focus too intently
on the transgressions and not validate both parties' needs as it might target the cheating more
predominantly instead of trying to uncover the root causes and ways to resolve.
For example, one source claims that lack of empirical evidence seems to cloud this model's
usage. The authors advise how little research supports its use with this type of therapeutic


Atkins, D. )., Baucom, D. )., Eldridge, K. )., & Christensen, A. ). (2005). Infidelity and behavioral
couple therapy: Optimism in the face of betrayal. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology,
73(1), 144-150.

Fife, S. T., Weeks, G. R., & Stellberg-Filbert, J. (2013). Facilitating forgiveness in the treatment of
infidelity: an interpersonal model. Journal Of Family Therapy, 35(4), 343-367.

Penn, C. D., Hernádez, S. L., & Bermúdez, J. M. (1997). USING A CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE
TO UNDERSTAND INFIDELITY IN COUPLES THERAPY. American Journal Of Family Therapy, 25(2),

View Full Posting Details