Explore BrainMass
Share

Legal Critical Thinking Exercise

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Analyze and prepare a critique of the following situation:

Mary has worked for Bob for two years. About 6 months ago, Bob asked Mary out to dinner. They had a good time together and agreed that they had some real interests in common outside of work. The pair dated for two months. Mary initially liked Bob, but he was beginning to get annoying. He called her all the time, was very pushy about her seeing him, and wanted to control all aspects of her life; both at work and at home. Mary decided to call it off. When she told Bob that she did not want to see him personally anymore, he went crazy on her. He told her she would be sorry and that he would see to it that she regretted it. Bob began to make life miserable for Mary at work. She suddenly started to get poor performance evaluations after two years of exemplary reviews. Even the managers above Bob were beginning to make comments about her poor attitude. Mary decided it was time to act. She was worried she would be fired, all because Bob wanted her to continue to date him. She loved her job and knew she did quality work. She made an appointment with the HR manager.

Using the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1991, discuss the type of sexual harassment Mary thinks she is experiencing. What are the obligations of the HR manager once Mary reports this? Discuss the likelihood that Bob would be found guilty of sexually harassing Mary. If the HR manager investigates and finds Mary is telling the truth, what should s/he do to handle the situation so that the company is not found complicit by the EEOC if further complaint is made? If found in Mary's favor, what options does the HR manager have to remedy the situation?

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 8:21 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-law/legal-critical-thinking-exercise-537465

Solution Preview

Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcome sexual conduct is a term or condition of employment is considered as a violation of 29 C.F.R. 1604.11(a). The two types of sexual harassment are quid pro quo and a hostile environment. Mary's type of sexual harassment is quid pro quo, which occurs when rejection of or submission to such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual (The information was obtained at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/currentissues.html).
The EEOC requires employers take reasonable actions to prevent ...

Solution Summary

The legal critical thinking exercises are examined.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Negligent tort, relates to consumer safety and baby monitors

Negligent Tort

Visit the Consumer Product Safety Division website. Click on Consumer Safety. Click on Recalls. Choose one product that has been recalled.
1.Describe the product subject to recall, including the recall date, recall number, and the reason for the recall.

2.Analyze whether the manufacturer would be liable for negligence if the product had not been recalled and had caused harm to a consumer.

3.Discusses the following in relation to the product recall:
a.Duty of Care
b.Standard of Care
c.Breach of the Duty of Care
d.Actual Causation
e.Proximate Causation
f.Actual Injury
g.Defenses to Negligence

4.Analyze and apply a relevant consumer protection statute identified under "Consumer Protection" in Chapter 8 of your text in conjunction with the product recall that you have identified.Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

Submit a four- to five-page paper (not including title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide and must cite at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

View Full Posting Details