Explore BrainMass
Share

Finding legal issues in a fact pattern regarding torts and contracts

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Discuss all legal issue for following case.
(1) " Sweet Samantha was at the grocery store. She slipped on a banana peel left by another customer. A young child was eating one of the bananas from his father's cart and dropped it on the floor. Samantha injured her ankle and was limping as she left the store. Another customer saw her in the parking lot. He offered to assist her with her groceries and even offered to follow her home and help her there. She agreed and gave him her address. When she arrived home, she waited for him but he did not show up. She waited to long that some of her food was ruined as it was a very hot day."
(2) ''Sly Sid owned a house. He wanted to sell it fast. he placed an advertisement on Craigs list, offering to sell the furniture with the house. He also put a sign in his yard. He placed the advertisement using the name of a local realtor but he was not actually affiliated with them. Silly Sarah was looking for a house and saw Sid's sign in his yard. Sid showed her around the house. He explained that although the basement had some water damage that he had fixed the issue. he also told he that in the summer he had some lovely rose bushes at the front of the house. Sarah agreed to buy house. She later found out that Sid was married but that his wife knew nothing about the sale. She also found out about the furniture and demanded that it be included. Finally, she found out that the basement water issue had been worked but not fixed. The realtor seeks a commission on the sale."

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 25, 2018, 9:38 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-law/finding-legal-issues-fact-pattern-regarding-torts-contracts-581098

Solution Preview

1) Here, Sweet Samantha may have a negligence claim against the grocery store. They owed her a duty of care and breached it when they didn't pick up the banana peel. She may also have a strict liability claim against the store as we don't expect banana peels to be on the floor of a grocery store. This claim will only work if it can be proven that the banana peel had been laying on the ground for some time. She may have a slight negligence claim against the father who's child dropped the banana peel on the floor but this will probably fail as the father has no heightened duty ...

Solution Summary

The legal issues exist in a slip and fall incident in a grocery store and a house sale where false representations are made.

$2.19
See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

Your sister has come up with what she thinks is a brilliant idea for a home-based business - a website which helps lonely people find their perfect match by comparing different singles website services.

Your sister has come up with what she thinks is a brilliant idea for a home-based business - a website which helps lonely people find their perfect match by comparing different singles website services. She intends to link to some of the top dating sites, several alternative ones, and a few regional ones. While she explains her idea to you, you stop her in mid-sentence and say, "Whoa there, remember Bidder's Edge?" She has no idea what you're talking about, so you give her the following article.

Trampling through the Websites-When is "Linking" an Illegal Trespass?
LEAD STORY-DATELINE: The Recorder, 5/26/00.

"Linking" is a common practice on the Internet. One Web page often establishes a "link" to another web page or web site. This practice normally benefits the linked web site, as it increases the number of individuals that might access and use the site. Bidder's Edge, Inc. was a company that helped consumers comparison-shop for the lowest price on auction web sites by posting auction items on its web site. Bidder's Edge used an automated process to search various auction sites for items to post for customers' use. eBay was one of the auction sites searched by Bidders' Edge, and Bidder's Edge sought to negotiate terms for performing its automated searches of eBay. Negotiations failed, and eBay prohibited access to its servers. To circumvent this prohibition, Bidder's Edge used proxy servers (not directly linked to Bidder's Edge) to continue its automated searches. When eBay discovered this, eBay filed suit and sought a preliminary injunction to prevent Bidder's Edge's continued automated searches and use of eBay's site. eBay claimed it would be irreparably harmed, pending a trial in the year 2001, if Bidder's Edge was allowed to continue its activities. The alleged harm included reduced system performance, system unavailability, or data loss.

eBay filed suit based on several causes of action; one was that Bidder's Edge was guilty of trespass to personal property. Under California law, in order to prevail in a suit for trespass based on accessing a computer system, the injured party must show the defendant intentionally and without authorization interfered with the plaintiff's possessory interest in the computer system, and that the defendant's unauthorized use approximately resulted in damage to plaintiff.

Bidder's Edge responded to the request for a preliminary injunction by arguing that it could not trespass because eBay's site is publicly accessible. So one portion of Bidder's argument was that there could not be a trespass, because there was no interference with a private property right. Bidder's Edge also argued that no irreparable harm would occur if the preliminary injunction was not granted, because its 80,000-100,000 hits per day represented a small fraction (approximately 1 ½ percent) of the hits to eBay's site. eBay admitted that these hits represented a relatively slight interference with eBay's servers. The district court rejected Bidder's arguments.

In eBay Inc. v. Bidder's Edge Inc., 99-21200, California Northern District Court Judge Ronald Whyte ruled that eBay was likely to prevail on the trespassing claim, and granted the preliminary injunction. In its opinion, the court found that eBay's servers were private property. eBay intended to give conditional and limited public access to those servers, and eBay did not intend that the public use its servers in the way contemplated by Bidder's Edge. The court noted that in eBay's use agreement, it specifically prohibited the type of automated access used by Bidder's Edge. Further, the court ruled that irreparable harm could occur should a number of companies engage in this automated access process.

After reading the article about eBay which you have sent her, your sister emails you with the several questions listed below. All of her questions indicate that she is trying to figure out how to design her Internet dating website so that it is legal and so that she does not get tangled up in a complicated lawsuit.

Write an email to your sister that addresses all of her concerns and the questions below and that helps her to decide the best course. Place your response in the drop box.

QUESTIONS:

What did Bidder's Edge do that was different than eBay's normal customers? Why does it matter to eBay?

Look in your text. What is the definition of traditional trespass to personal property?

Does the definition of trespass to personal property in your text differ from the California definition of trespass to computer services? How?

Submit your email to your instructor via the drop box.

View Full Posting Details