Explore BrainMass

Determine the Maximum Binding Constant for a Protein Complex

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

Plot the following data using a Sacatchard type plot. The change in fluorscence is proportional to binding.

A) Determine the max binding constant for the protein complex.

Realtive Fluorescence (Response) [Protein] nM (concentration of added protein)

5.70E+04 | 0
5.73E+04 | 0.1
5.78E+04 | 0.3
5.89E+04 | 1
6.03E+04 | 3
6.13E+04 | 10
6.17E+04 | 30
6.18E+04 | 50

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 24, 2018, 6:13 pm ad1c9bdddf

Solution Preview

Scatchard plots show:

Bound/Free vs. Bound

That's all there is to it. If we plot this, the x-axis intercept will be the Bound(max).

We have to transform the data so that it makes sense. The raw data given in the question is "relative fluorescence" and "protein concentration." ...

Solution Summary

The solution provides the required sacatchard plot of the data in an attached excel sheet along with an explanation of what this represents and how to determine the maximum binding constant from the graph just formed.

See Also This Related BrainMass Solution

A solution for Allosterity and Cooperativity

When a compound made up of non-polar molecules is mixed with an aqueous solvent such as water, the molecules cluster together into a ball while water tends to form a ring around them. They do so because they are hydrophobic (. Wikibooks 2015).

When more of this solute is added, the water ring is disturbed as more of the hydrophobic molecules join the non-polar core and the displaced water molecules are freed to move around. This causes high disorder in the solution environment referred to as high entropy.
According to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, "The total entropy of the system plus its surrounding must always be increasing"(Wikibooks 2015). In this case the release of the water molecules from the cage around nonpolar surfaces is favourable and responsible for phenomenon called the hydrophobic effect.

The degree of freedom i.e. the free movement of drugs in solution or receptor proteins also favours entropy optimization and the binding phenomenon reduces this freedom as well as the binding affinity. Creation of more rigid drug molecules with less interference on the protein degree of freedom results in compensated enthalpy/entropy environments that favour binding affinity.

1. The binding affinity of drug molecules to protein receptor sites is a function of the solubility of the drug molecule and the part of the protein bound to the drug. The less soluble the drug molecule is, the more hydrophobic it is and therefore the higher the entropy as explained in the background above which creates a favourable environment for entropic optimization. Solvation of the protein (hydrophobicity) that is buried during binding will increase binding affinity if it is more hydrophobic. Binding Affinity (Ka) is a function of Gibbs Energy which is a difference between enthalpy and entropy. A more negative enthalpy and more positive entropy are more favourable for binding affinity (Freire 2005).

2. The limitations of this approach to affinity optimization include the following:

2.1. The resulting drug molecules are insoluble in water due to their hydrophobicity

2.2. Drug resistance may result from mutations of the binding site.

3. Enthalpy/Entropy compensation is any gain in enthalpy contributions to binding is opposed by an accompanying loss in entropic contributions. Affinity optimization is accomplished by selecting chemical modifications that carry a low enthalpy/entropy compensation ((Lumry and Rajender, 1970; Eftink et al., 1983). Examples of the practical application of the entropy/enthalpy compensation principle including conformational constraints are all 1st generation HIV Protease Inhibitors Nelfinavir, Saquinavir and Ritonavir (Velasquez et.al 2003)

View Full Posting Details