This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!
I'm not certain what is being asked and I need help on where to start.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com May 24, 2023, 1:27 pm ad1c9bdddf
See attachment please!
Results of multiple regression for Defect
Multiple R 0.9383
Adj R-Square 0.8612
StErr of Est 7.2326
Source df SS MS F p-value
Explained 4 9621.5292 2405.3823 45.9828 0.0000
Unexplained 25 1307.7628 52.3105
Coefficient Std Err t-value p-value
Constant 1.0312 73.8985 0.0140 0.9890
Temperature 17.4189 9.5635 1.8214 0.0805
Density -1.5741 1.7446 -0.9022 0.3755
Rate 0.1184 0.1330 0.8904 0.3817
Morning -0.9186 3.0655 -0.2997 0.7669
Use the output above to answer parts (h) through (l).
h) Returning to the p-value for the indicator variable Morning, what conclusion can you draw?
From the above table, we know that the p-value for the indicator variable Morning is 0.7669 and the corresponding t-value=-0.2997. So, we can roughly know that the indicator variable Morning as a predictor variable has a small impact on the number of defects.
i) Using non-technical language, state and interpret the standard error of the estimate.
From the above table, we know that the standard error of the estimate is 7.2326. Also, we know the regression equation is
Number of defects Y=1.0312+ 17.4189* TemperatureX1 -1.5741* DensityX2
So, we can use this equation to predict the number of defects Y*. If we use 95% confidence level, then the real value for the number of defects can be away from Y* by , ie., (Y*-1.96*7.2326, Y*+1.96*7.2326)
j) Is Rate significant? What does Rate's significance or lack thereof imply about ...
The results of multiple regression for Defect are determined. An alternative hypothesis is analyzed.