Explore BrainMass
Share

Undercover in a Chicken Factory.

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

The attached article is about a field study in Arkansas. Discuss the cultural identity and the conditions of the newest wave of immigrants into the US and Arkansas. What are the key points made in the article. Include a discussion as to whether this article suggests that Latinos are taking jobs away from whites and blacks.

Chapter 4 Economic Globalization. Article 14. Undercover in a Chicken Factory. Steve Striffler. pg 98-104.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 16, 2018, 9:09 pm ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/sociology/theoretical-framework/undercover-chicken-factory-515427

Solution Preview

Most of the Tyson employees (at that plant) are not American born.
Tyson seems to care little about its employees, just that the job gets done.
Whites seem to have moved on in the 1990s " the author is not clear, but he implies that they left for better jobs during the 1990s boom. He does not say this outright.

Most of the line workers are women, since they are forbidden to life heavy objects or directly run certain types of machines.
Line work (and related areas) is very difficult. It is ?unskilled? and yet, a tremendous amount of skill and dexterity is needed to run the equipment, etc. not to mention that the firm is forcing fewer workers to do more work than before, due to layoffs. Even more, the equipment seems to be in poor repair, so work is always being interrupted.

The older generation of managers refused to push workers the way that Tyson wanted them too. So they got forced out and a new, younger group was brought in. ...

Solution Summary

The expert examines undercover in a chicken factory.

$2.19
Similar Posting

Utah AG Gag Law

AG GAG LAWS: The Utah Legislature approved a bill in 2012 that makes it a class B misdemeanor to trespass on private livestock or poultry operations and record sound or images without the owner's permission. It also prohibits seeking employment with the intent of making those recordings. Leaving a recording device for that purpose is a class A misdemeanor.

The law does not criminalize the possession or distribution of unlawful recordings, but focuses on trespassing and filming while on the property, according to the state.

Journalists sued, claiming the law violates their rights to free speech. They contend the law criminalizes undercover investigations and videography at slaughterhouses, factory farms and other agricultural operations, and suppresses speech that is critical of the industry:

"While no journalist has the right to trespass on private property, the overbreadth of the Utah statute poses a substantial risk of criminalizing lawful — and constitutionally protected — newsgathering activity," according to the brief."

Does the prohibition on filming violate the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech? Explain your answer by applying the property legal standard to the facts above.

View Full Posting Details