Explore BrainMass

Explore BrainMass

    Utah AG Gag Law

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    AG GAG LAWS: The Utah Legislature approved a bill in 2012 that makes it a class B misdemeanor to trespass on private livestock or poultry operations and record sound or images without the owner's permission. It also prohibits seeking employment with the intent of making those recordings. Leaving a recording device for that purpose is a class A misdemeanor.

    The law does not criminalize the possession or distribution of unlawful recordings, but focuses on trespassing and filming while on the property, according to the state.

    Journalists sued, claiming the law violates their rights to free speech. They contend the law criminalizes undercover investigations and videography at slaughterhouses, factory farms and other agricultural operations, and suppresses speech that is critical of the industry:

    "While no journalist has the right to trespass on private property, the overbreadth of the Utah statute poses a substantial risk of criminalizing lawful — and constitutionally protected — newsgathering activity," according to the brief."

    Does the prohibition on filming violate the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech? Explain your answer by applying the property legal standard to the facts above.

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 7:40 am ad1c9bdddf

    Solution Preview

    Step 1
    The prohibition on filming does not violate the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech. The point is that a person may film or record sound or images from public property. Only if a person trespasses and is on private property, he cannot film without the permission of the owner. If a person is on public property and films something on private property, the right is protected by First Amendment. For the First Amendment protection to be operational, the ...

    Solution Summary

    This posting gives you a step-by-step explanation of AG Gag Law in Utah. The response also contains the sources used.