Explore BrainMass
Share

Explore BrainMass

    The First Amendment in a Court of Law

    This content was COPIED from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the already-completed solution here!

    What is the difference between the Hicklin rule and the Miller test for obscenity?

    What are three processes or legal devices a trial judge can use to try to ameliorate or remedy the effects of mass media publicity about a case?

    What must a trial judge do before he or she can issue a restrictive order against the press during a criminal proceeding?

    © BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 10, 2019, 5:05 am ad1c9bdddf
    https://brainmass.com/law/constitutional-law/first-amendment-court-law-491514

    Solution Preview

    Miller test: what the average person would see as obscene. It cannot have any real artistic value. Its just straight porn.

    Hicklin is different - it is about harm. Even if something has artistic value, if it hurts the common morality of the people, it is obscene.

    Of course, Hicklin is far more restrictive. It assumes that "prurient interest" is involved. This means that its primary purpose is provocative, not evocative. In other words, that the obscenity is about manipulating your emotions in an anti social ...

    Solution Summary

    The expert examines the first amendment in a court of law. The three processes of legal devices a trial judge can use to try to ameliorate or remedy the effects of mass media publicity about a case. The differences between Hicklin rule and the Miller test for obscenity.

    $2.19