What happens if you treat the scientific account of the big bang theory as a creation of myth? In other words, can the creation myth and the big bang theory be compatible or can one explain the other?© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 12:09 am ad1c9bdddf
There are a few similarities between the two as I have found in articles I will put at the end of this post. The most similar is that in the beginning there was "nothing". That the heavens and the earth were born from nothingness. Of course, the big bang theory states that the galaxy was started by a bang created by gases that built up and Genesis states that the heavens and the earth were created by a higher being. However, they both began from nothing.
Also, Genesis states that in the beginning God said, "let there be light and there was light". The big bang theory also states that there was a burst of light in the beginning.
Another similarity between the two is that although scientists believe the big bang occurred, they cannot explain why it happened. This is similar to Genesis. Religious leaders believe it happened, but know little of why it was brought about.
It is said that both creationism and the big bang theory are ...
Similarities and differences between the big bang theory and creationism. Resources and sites are included.
Big Bang Theory, Beginnings and Ending of the Universe
One hundred years ago, many scientists believed that the universe was infinite and eternal, with no beginning and no end. When Einstein first developed his general theory of relativity, he found it predicted that the universe should be either expanding or contracting. He believed so strongly in an eternal and unchanging universe that he modified the theory, a modification he would later call his "greatest blunder". Why do you think Einstein and others assumed that the universe had no beginning? Do you think that a universe with a definite beginning in time, some 15 billion or so years ago, has any important philosophical implications? Explain.
You've probably noticed that, in discussing the Big Bang theory, we never quite talk about the first instant. Even our most speculative theories at present take us back only to within 10-43 seconds of creation. Do you think it will ever be possible for science to consider the moment of creation itself? Will we ever be able to answer questions such as why the Big Bang happened? Defend your opinions.
If you could live forever, would you choose to do so? Suppose the universe will keep expanding forever, as the bulk of observations currently suggest. How would you satisfy your energy needs as time goes on? How would you grow food? What would you do with all that time?
Scientists, philosophers, and poets alike have speculated on the fate of the universe. How would you prefer the universe as we know it to end, in a big crunch or through eternal expansion? Explain the reasons behind your preference.