Explore BrainMass

Vagueness in Arguments

This content was STOLEN from BrainMass.com - View the original, and get the solution, here!

Give an explanation of the impact of vagueness in arguments. Then explain when and why a communicator would want to be vague in an argument.

© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com September 26, 2018, 1:03 am ad1c9bdddf - https://brainmass.com/psychology/social-psychology/vagueness-arguments-524389

Solution Preview

(1) Give an explanation of the impact of vagueness in arguments.

The focus on vagueness emerged as a controversial debate on common sense and logic in metaphysics. Several views were offered in which views on vagueness in arguments were offered from three dimensional and four-dimensional perspectives (e.g., Sider, 2002 as cited in Varzi (2005). The concept of vagueness suggest that four-dimensional objects need no justification; whereas, three dimensional objects must have evidence. For example, the question is posed, 'Under what conditions do objects come into or go out of existence?' Common sense is based on a three-dimensional concept in which objects extend across three spatial dimensions and persist through time by being fully present at all time (e.g.., Lewis, 1961 as cited in Varzi, 2005). From a four-dimensional perspective, it is argued that time ...

Solution Summary

This solution provides an explanation of the impact of vagueness in arguments, and explains why vagueness may be used in arguments.