Purchase Solution

Mandatory sentencing versus judicial discretion

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

Outline the argument for each of the opposing positions of mandatory sentencing versus judicial discretion. Argument should convey both sides of the argument clearly and dispassionately. Try to write it in such a way that the readers cannot guess which side you favor. Support your argument with reference(s) to articles from current peer-reviewed journals. References to laws and legal journals are also acceptable, if properly cited. You may cite the text, being certain to indicate when you have created a secondary citation.

Resources:
Wrightsman, et al. Chapters 1 & 2
Wrightsman, L. S., Greene, E., Nietzel, M.T., & Fortune, W.H. (2014). Psychology and the legal system (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning

Greenberg, S. & Shuman, D. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, p. 50-57. (available in Walden Library)

Attachments
Purchase this Solution
Solution Summary

A discussion of the pros and cons of mandatory sentencing and judicial discretion are examined.

Solution Preview

Outline for your paper:

i) Mandatory Sentencing
PROS
1. consistency across states or provinces
2. increases accountability for sentencing
3. equality in sentencing between genders

CONS
1. racial disparities- imposed disproportionately among certain racial groups ie. Puerto Ricans, African Americans, ...

Purchase this Solution
Free BrainMass Quizzes
Motion Perception

This quiz will help students test their understanding of the differences between the types of motion perception, as well as the understanding of their underlying mechanisms.

The Psychology of Sleep

This quiz is to check your understanding of the sleep-related part of psychology.

Theories of Work Motivation

This quiz tests the student's understanding of the major theories of work motivation from an organizational behavior perspective.

Anxiety Disorders

This quiz is designed to help students gain a better understanding of various types of anxiety disorders.

A Review of Qualitative and Quantitative methodologies

This quiz is designed to test your knowledge of qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Knowing the difference between the two can help in making the important decision of which to use when conducting research.

View More Free Quizzes
Related BrainMass Solutions

  • Judges Authority

    A judge's failure to abide by the sentencing guidelines in issuing a sentence would constitute an abuse of judicial discretion" (Judicial Discretion, The Free Dictionary, http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Judicial+Discretion).

  • Mandatory, Determinate and Indeterminate Sentencing

    Mandatory minimum sentences severely limit judicial discretion. Judges must adhere to mandatory sentencing laws and cannot issue an alternate sentence for any reason.

  • Mandatory Sentencing Laws

    523568 Mandatory Sentencing Laws As our judicial system continues to become an ever evolving system we look for new ways to impose punishment within the scope of the law and in a humane manner.

  • Dual-Court sysytem

    Mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines have infringed upon the autonomy that judges had in regard to philosophical rationales for sentencing defendants when presiding over presented facts.

  • Five Types of Sentencing Systems

    There is no flexibility in the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines and ensures that inmates serve mandatory time based on the severity of their crime. Presumptive sentencing puts the guidelines of sentencing with the presiding judge.

  • criminal trial process

    The consequences are usually dictated by mandatory sentencing rules where the minimum sentence for certain crimes are given to the judges and judicial discretion is limited.

  • Determinate vs. Indeterminate Sentencing

    However, prosecutorial discretion still stands during the judicial process.

  • Critical Sentencing Issues in Criminal Justice

    There is no flexibility in the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines and ensures that inmates serve mandatory time based on the severity of their crime. Presumptive sentencing puts the guidelines of sentencing with the presiding judge.

  • Racial disparity & Sentencing

    Crow and Bales (2006) suggested that the disparities in sentencing appear to be due to each rationale at 50-50. 50% is due to judicial/legal discretion, 50% is due to what advocacy groups feel are discriminative causes.

View More Related Solutions