There are two definitive paths to terrorism; the "top-down process" and the "bottom-up process" (CSIS, 2007, in your course materials folder). Unfortunately, due to certain laws, civil rights, and civil liberties, many potential terrorists are too far down the path and well on their way to becoming full-fledged terrorists by the time intelligence agencies are aware of them.
Discuss these paths to terrorism. What are some of the critical elements in these models? What are some of the keys to interdicting these paths? Is one easier to identify and interdict than the other? Are there other models?
To fully understand the various dimensions of Islamic terrorism, compare and contrast Hezbollah's and Al-Qaida's motivations and actions. Is one easier to defend morally / legally than the other or are both equally evil?
Essay has to be at least 500 words.© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com October 17, 2018, 1:18 am ad1c9bdddf
Hello & thank you for using Brainmass. The solution below should get you started. If you have any question in relation to the information presented below, please feel free to leave it in the feedback section. Additionally, I have listed similar references if you feel the need to expand on the narrative for further research. Good luck!
OTA 105878/Xenia Jones
Paths to Terrorism
In the 2007 CSIS Congressional Forum on Islam, Prof. Mohammed Hafez argued that there is no one path to terrorism/radicalization. For him, there are many entryways and they are influenced by a number of variables including personality types. He proposed that there are 3 different kinds of radicals - idealists, true believers, and reformed sinners. Idealists are radicalized via identification with the images of suffering/humiliated Muslims and take on the cause of jihad/holy war while true believers have always believed in jihad and only require a minimal trigger towards radicalization (i.e. the 2003 Iraq Invasion). Lastly, reformed sinners are the radicals who have led a secular life as immigrants in Europe or the US (enjoying a ...
The solution is a 623-word essay that discusses the "top-down process" and the "bottom-up process" considered as the 2 min paths to terrorism. References are listed. A word version fo the solution is attached for easy printing and download.
Shifts in the PPF
I help in answering this question. Please provide diagrams along with explanations.
Shifts in the PPF. Terrorist attacks foster instability and may affect productivity over the short and long term. Do you think that the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon affected short or long term productivity in the United States? Explain your response and show any movements in the PPF.View Full Posting Details