Purchase Solution

Ethics of Weisel's research

Not what you're looking for?

Ask Custom Question

What are your thoughts in regards to the ethics of Weisel's research? Do his findings justify the relative deprivation of the animal's senses? Would such an experiment be supported by today's research institutes? Why or why not?

Purchase this Solution

Solution Summary

The ethics of Weisel's research are determined.

Solution Preview

Torsten Wiesel's research required him to use baby monkey's and kittens and deprive them of sensory stimulation. This left the animals blind, or partially blind. This raises questions of animal abuse.

The American Psychological Association's guidelines on animal testing state that there is to be no procedure that causes "adverse stimulation" or "signs of distress" in a non-human animal (APA, 2010). Since presumably no pain was caused the animal, this research might be justified. But it is also clear that deliberate blindness or partial blindness is a grey area. The cats were anesthetized and given a muscle relaxer. Hence, it is doubtful if they felt any pain.

The conclusion of his research is to say that the development of our visual field is ...

Purchase this Solution

Free BrainMass Quizzes
Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy

Short quiz relating to Descartes

The World Health Organization

This quiz assesses the students knowledge about the World Health Organization. Although listed under “Philosophy” it is relevant to health care, political science, pre-med, and social scientist students as well.