Is Happiness a Sufficient Criterion for Moral Worth?

Related BrainMass Solutions

• UTILITARIANISM: BACKGROUND, BIOGRAPHY AND A SKETCH OF THE THEORY

  According to the Principle of Utility, there is only one criterion that determines whether an action is right or wrong. HAPPINESS ? What is happiness? For Bentham, happiness is pleasure and an absence of pain.

• Kant & Mill

  - Moral deliberation for a utilitarian will consist in a calculus of outcomes, weighing pleasure against ill, that is completely alien to Kant.

• Detailed account of Classical Utilitarianism

  "Everybody to count for one and nobody for more than one"(Bentham). ? Calculating happiness is a matter of weighing each person's happiness equally, and maximizing overall happiness (I.e. aggregate utility).

• Affirmative Action and Wrongs of Discrimination

  For example, in this case, discrimination is wrong because discrimination is making a clear exception for self, company, or group, while not making it an acceptable universal rule for self, company, or group.

• Biblical and Secular Ethical Principles

  The ethical implications for managers not collecting proper data in sufficient scope and quantity before planning is that it is an action of low moral worth.

• Kant's Ethics: Introduction, Overview, The Categorical Imperative

  Rough Kantian criterion for right action An act is right if and only if it is done according to a rational principle.

• JS Mills Political Theory on power

  He argued that "the moral worth of actions is to be judged in terms of the consequences of those actions." How can you apply this to something you know? Let's look at some current moral standards: ?

• Ethics Theories & The Trolley Problems

  Kantian View Advice - use Kant's idea of 'moral worth or moral imperative', for example: For Kant, if the purpose of life is happiness, it is impossible to achieve.

• Moral Dilemmas-Utilitarian, Kantian and Rawisian

  Kant's philosophy is that actions performed for the sake of duty have moral worth.